Home Blog Page 120

Freedom & The Guns of July 1863

0

American Union Flag (XXL)I was a history geek long before I was a lawyer. I spent a substantial amount of time at UC Davis studying 19th Century United States History, the diary of John Quincy Adams and the US Civil War.

150 years ago, the very concept of liberty hinged in the month of July in 1863. Here is the breakdown of key events:

July 1-3: Gettysburg

July 4: The Union victory at Vicksburg, lead by Ulysses S Grant

July 11: First Draft in the Union

July 13-16: New York Draft Riots

July 18: The Massachusetts 54th Assault on Fort Wagner

The Civil War

If we were to honor all of the fallen in the Civil War with a monument of names it would be the size of 11 Vietnam Memorials.

The Civil War was caused by eleven states that committed mass treason to nullify a Presidential Election because of their self-proclaimed “right” to own other human beings.

The order of succession was in direct inverse proportion to the population of slaves within the state. With the exception of South Carolina, each state in rebellion had pro-Union troops, making the Civil War a war within each state.

The Civil War had been 80 years in the making since the Constitutional Convention, when slavery was thought to be on the path to extinction. The invention of the cotton gin perpetuated the national sin, leading to multiple crises, from the Compromise of 1820; to the Gag Rule in the 1830s; the 1844 election of James K Polk & the Mexican-American War, which lead to the Compromise of 1850; the Dred Scott opinion in 1857 followed by John Brown & Harper’s Ferry, and finally the war itself after the first shot at Fort Sumter.

For those who argue that the Civil War was about “State’s Rights,” let’s examine the Confederate Constitution. It was nearly identical to the US Constitution, with several key differences:

The President served one six-year term and could not run for re-election;

The President had a line item veto; and

The Confederate Constitution bluntly defended slavery in Section 9(I)(4) with “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed.”

The defense of slavery was driven home with Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens’ “Cornerstone Speech.” Stephens flatly rejected Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal with the haunting statement:

Our new Government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition.

The only property right at issue in the Civil War was the “right” to own other human beings.

There is nothing more Un-American than such a twisted belief.

And that is why men and women lined up to fight to preserve the U.S. Constitution when eleven states decided they could break the country in two when they could no longer decide the Presidency.

The Hinge of Liberty

The Civil War had not gone well for the North, often due to the lack of audacious generals and bad command decisions. July 1863 was a tipping point.

The three-day battle of Gettysburg had the same number of casualties as the seven years of the Vietnam War. The Union victory at Gettysburg could have ended the war if the Union Army had crushed the retreating Confederate Army. That did not happen. However, the South would never invade a Northern State again.

GeneralGrantVicksburg was another significant loss for the South.

The city would not celebrate the 4th of July again until after World War II.

Vicksburg was one of the key battles that propelled General Grant to the command of the Union Army.

Grant was not afraid to fight and had done the math that the Union outnumbered the South 4 to 1. In a war of attrition, it was only a matter of time before the North would put down the rebellion.

The first Union draft launched the largest race riot in US History in New York City. The New York Herald published the names of everyone who died at Gettysburg, followed by the names of those who had been drafted. Each were several pages long.

The Irish population in New York City exploded in three days of rioting. Up until that point, African-Americans had been racially depicted in political cartoons and lithographs as tool-welding apes. The Irish who rioted went on a killing spree, including lynching people, burning them alive and beating the faces off of police officers. The exact number of dead is not known, because of the bodies that were dumped in the river.

President Lincoln had to send in troops who had been at Gettysburg to put down the rioting with cannon and bayonet.

While New York recovered from a horrific three days, something happened that changed pubic opinion on July 18 in South Carolina.

The Massachusetts 54 was a volunteer regiment of free northern African-Americans, lead by Robert Gould Shaw. The ranks of the 54th included the sons of Fredrick Douglas. Shaw himself was the son of Bostonian abolitionists.

civil war statueDespite their depiction in the film Glory, the 54th was never deprived uniforms, boots, or supplies. No one deserted. No one was whipped. Moreover, when Shaw learned that his men were to be paid less than white soldiers, it was his idea for them all not to take pay.

Colonel Shaw volunteered the 54th to lead the frontal assault on Ft. Wagner in South Carolina. Those men marched straight into Hell. From sand dunes to an uphill battle under cannon fire, those soldiers faced bullets that would tear off limbs.

The 54th lost over half their numbers. Shaw was one of them. The Confederates broke the practice of returning dead officers after the battle. Shaw was stripped naked and buried with his men in a mass grave.

MA54MemorialThe Fort was never taken by force until the Confederates abandoned it months later.

The United States did a massive about face after Ft. Wagner. The story and images of a gallant battle replaced the racist lithographs from just a week before.

William Carney of the 54th would ultimately become the first African-American to be awarded the Medal of Honor for his heroics in carrying the regimental colors.

It is important to remember that in the years leading up to the Civil War many in the North believed that African-Americans should either be returned to Africa or colonized in South America. Those unrealistic ideas vanished after Fort Wagner, because people did not see the men of the 54th as African-Americans, but as fellow Americans.

President Lincoln was able to argue that those willing to fight for their country should be able to vote in it because of the sacrifice of the Massachusetts 54th.

We should all remember the Sesquicentennial of July 1863. Thousands of Americans were killed to preserve freedom in our country.

The key events of the first 18 days of July 1863 have to be analyzed together for their significance. All are connected. The sacrifices of many ultimately would give us the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments and the country we know today.

UnkownSoldiersGett

Kramer vs. Kramer (aka Fictional Characters vs. Their Real Life Inspirations)

0

Stand UpI love stand-up comedians (Chris Rock, Kathleen Madigan, Jim Gaffigan…) but had never heard of comedian Mike Maron until Louis CK talked about his podcast on Howard Stern.  And then Stern interviewed Maron when he was promoting his new show on IFC.  It’s called Maron and it’s a fictionalized account of his life.  Maron is one of those stand-up comedians who came up with a lot of the comedians we all know – Louis, Jon Stewart, and Janeane Garofalo – but he never made it big (although he’s getting closer now).  And he’s angry about that.  Or was, anyway.  He’s getting past it now, apparently, and spends a great deal of time on his podcast apologizing to the comedians he was mean to out of jealousy.

So I just finished watching the first season of Maron.  In it, Maron plays himself, other actors play fictional characters, and some actors play fictionalized versions of themselves.  And he references characters from his real life – his dad, his ex-wife, etc.  His relationship with some of these characters – on and off screen – is pretty toxic, so it made me wonder…what happens when real life people are depicted as “fictional” characters in shows or books?

Old Movie ProjectorThere are classic examples of real people who were used, in “fictionalized” form, in TV shows and movies.  In his masterpiece, Orson Welles based the citizen himself in Citizen Kane on William Randolph Hearst.  Hearst didn’t bother to sue, however, choosing to use his considerable wealthy and power to try to stop the movie from being made or distributed at all (although he wasn’t successful, thank goodness).

In that more recent classic of the small screen, Seinfeld (good lord, that makes me feel old!), both the Kramer and Costanza characters were based, at least in part, on a real life Costanza and Kramer.  Kramer didn’t sue for the inspiration he provided, although he did send a list of demands to Castle Rock for the use of his name.

GavelThe real-life Costanza, on the other hand, did sue.  Costanza v. Seinfeld, 693 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y.Sup. 1999).  But just like his fictional counterpart, Costanza had nothing but bad luck.  The court not only found that his claims were either baseless or not allowed under New York law, but also held that his suit was so frivolous that he and his attorney each had to pay a sanction of $2,500 to the defendants.

Other plaintiffs in similar situations usually don’t fare any better.  In a case against the writers and producers of CSI, for example. the plaintiffs filed a defamation claim because of the actions taken by characters on an episode of CSI.  Tamkin v. CBS Broadcasting, Inc., 193 Cal.App.4th 133 (Cal. App. 2011).  In the rough draft, the TV characters actually had the same names as the plaintiffs (the names were changed before the show was filmed) and both the fictional and real male character worked in the real estate industry.  The court ruled, however, that even if the depiction was defamatory (the male character was a hard drinker and into kinky sexual acts), the question was whether a reasonable person would understand the characters to actually refer to the plaintiffs.  The fact that the real and fictional characters shared both first and last names (and that the wives in both instances had the same name) was not enough.  Even the similarity in the area of work for the fictional and real characters was not enough.   Nor was a generally similar physical description enough.  Instead, such specific details as a special birthmark, birthplace, children’s names, educational background, or unique career were needed to assist a reasonable person to recognize that the fictional character is actually the real-life plaintiff.

In another case, the parties argued over whether the supposedly defamatory actions taken by a “fictionalized” character in a book could reasonably be understood as stating actual facts about the real person.  Smith v. Stewart, 660 S.E.2d 822 (Ga. App. 2008).  The book at issue contained the usual disclaimer, of course, about the novel being a work of fiction, but the appellate court still said that such a disclaimer (or the humorous nature of a publication) will not protect it from a defamation claim “if the allegedly defamatory statement could [] be reasonably understood as describing actual facts about the plaintiff or actual events in which he participated.”  In this instance, the plaintiff had a small measure of success because the appellate court found that there was a genuine factual dispute over that issue and so it sent the case back to the lower court.

In general, however, the courts seem reluctant to hold creative people (comedians, authors, screenwriters, etc.) liable for drawing inspiration from their real lives.  And, as a fan of comedians (and books, TV shows, and movies), I appreciate that.  I just have to hope I never tick off a budding comedian!

Bloomberg Law on Superman's Legal Duty to Save Jonathan Kent

0

Great video with attorney James Daily’s analysis on Superman’s legal duty to save his father in Man of Steel.

I agree with Mr. Daily’s legal analysis that Clark Kent did not have a legal duty to save his father. While that sounds extremely harsh, part of the theme in Man of Steel shows both of Clark Kent/Kal El’s fathers sacrificing themselves for their son.

From the legal point of view, Jonathan Kent made the choice himself to go back to the car to save the dog. Clark at no point started to rescue his father or left his father in a worse position, such as the classic issue of the rescue swimmer who abandons a rescue.

Check out the video to see more of Daily’s analysis.

There are many other legal issues in the film. In a prior post, I addressed the issue of Clark Kent visiting his minister in Would Superman Be Protected By the Clergy Privilege? There also would be a significant legal battle rivaling Superman and General Zod’s over insurance coverage for the destruction in Metropolis.

 

Vote The Legal Geeks for the ABA Journal Blawg 100

0

TessaGarfield_9600Please nominate The Legal Geeks for the ABA Journal Blawg 100.

We have had a great first year and would appreciate your vote to put us on the ABA Journal Blawg 100.

For any lawyer who is a fan of Doctor Who, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Star Trek or John Carter of Mars, we would appreciate your vote.

There are many excellent attorney bloggers who put in significant time to share their knowledge on the subject matter they are passionate about. You can nominate multiple blogs for the list, you just need to complete a separate nomination.

Voting Information:

Blog: The Legal Geeks www.thelegalgeeks.com

Twitter: @TheLegalGeeks

Nomination Link: http://www.abajournal.com/blawgs/blawg100_submit/

 

 

Anniversary Special: Judge Paul Grewal & Judge Matthew Sciarrino On Science Fiction

0

What tribbles are to the Starship Enterprise, Captain Kirk, and Mr. Spock, the parties’ ever-multiplying sealing and redaction requests are to this case, Judge Koh, and the undersigned.

Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15072 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2013).

 

In fact, on August 1, 2012 your tweets will be sent across the universe to a galaxy far, far away.

Judge Matthew Sciarrino
People of the State of New York v. Malcolm Harris, Docket No. 2011NY080152 (N.Y. Crim. Ct. June 30, 2012).

1stAnniversaryJessica and I were extremely honored to have Judge Paul Grewal and Judge Matthew Sciarrino join us for our first anniversary special.

Each took time to share their favorite science fiction story, what it meant to them and the impact science fiction has had upon them.

We hope you enjoy our anniversary special. Thank you Judge Grewal and Judge Sciarrino for sharing your thoughts on science fiction.

The Legal Geeks: Year One

0
Gavel

JoshToast_0852Thank you everyone for a very successful first year of The Legal Geeks.

Our adventure began last year when Jessica Mederson and I met over Tweeting my Bow Tie Law post Cowboys & Lawyers: Spaghetti Western eDiscovery.

Since that time, we have had a wonderful adventure across the legal issues in science fiction, comic books and pop culture.

Needless to say, I also have had a blast in going action figure and t-shirt shopping for “research.”

Rise of the Geek Lawyers

I have learned there are a substantial number of geek attorneys and in the United States. I was first alerted to this when a partner at a Big Law firm asked over lunch, “Hey, do you have the lightsaber app for your iPhone?”

How did the number of “geek” lawyers come to be?

Today, we have a substantial number of attorneys and judges from Generation X and Generation Y. We grew up with Gene Roddenberry/George Lucas/Steven Spielberg enriched childhoods. The stories from our youth that made a significant impact, from “I have been and always will be your friend” to “Throw me the idol, I’ll throw you the whip,” were truly important to many of us. We spent countless hours in the backyard with space ships and action figures. These were defining happy moments. Those memories without question would echo throughout our lives and practice of law.

So for every attorney who has considered making a Battlestar Galactica or X Files references in a points and authority, you are not alone.

Geek Discovery

The Legal Geeks has allowed me to go boldly beyond blogging about eDiscovery. In the past year, I have been able to research prenuptial agreements and the 6th Amendment right to counsel. Some of my favorite posts this year have included:

Han’s Legal Justification for Shooting Greedo First

Doctor Who & The Effect of Regenerations on the Validity of a Will

Assumption of Risk & Red Shirts on Star Trek

Jabba the Hutt & Employee Safety

Firefly & Lessons in Contract Law

I especially want to thank io9 for picking up my Firefly post and Above the Law for sharing multiple posts. I appreciate all of the Tweets and Facebook shares.

No, There is Another

JessicaMederson_9018Jessica Mederson is a wonderful blogging partner. A smart lawyer who has read the classic science fiction books for the last century, she was also into vampires before they were sparkling moody teenagers. Her post on judges who quoted Star Trek in opinions was brilliant and picked up by io9.

Jess has been a very good sport about podcasting in Sci Fi t-shirts and debating the finer points of legal geekdom.

We had an excellent adventure at the Paraben Forensic Innovation Conference and got to work with many other talented attorneys.

You Be The Judge

One of the greatest highlights this year has been getting to know Judge Matthew Sciarrino. He is a true civil servant who puts in long hours for the people of New York. People know of the newsworthy criminal cases he has presided over.

Gavel-on-White-SepiaWhat the Judge does not get credit for was checking on his courthouse after the damage caused by Hurricane Sandy and performing a marriage ceremony for a couple.

No power, people struggling to get back to normal after the storm and Judge Sciarrino took the time to do something kind: performed a wedding ceremony for two people trying to get married.

Judges across the country do similar quiet good works. I have seen many local judges volunteer for the county high school mock trial tournament. There are many other examples as well.  Their contributions to society are usually done without fanfare, but are not be forgotten by those they help.

In the past year, I also had the good fortune to spend time with Magistrate Judge John Facciola, moderated a panel with District Judge David Nuffer and had a blast with our anniversary podcast with Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal this year. I really cannot state how much I respect our judges. They work hard to uphold the Constitution and their service to country is very appreciated.

Oh, The Places You’ll Go

I attended the Alternative Press Expo and Big Wow! Comics Convention this year. In my opinion, attorneys attend legal conferences because they have to; people attend comic/geek conventions because they want to. I would like to find how we can make legal conferences events lawyers want to attend.

Presenting on Assumption of Risk & Red Shirts at PFIC
Presenting on Assumption of Risk & Red Shirts at PFIC

Part of the answer lies in the type of panel discussions that are held at conferences. The “geek” shows offer big names on topics and “how to” panels. While a Clarance Darrow cosplay panel would not likely be useful, focusing on how to conduct expert depositions, how to propound discovery requests for social media, or even how to balance billable hours to raising a family might be good starting points for conference organizers.

I am not sure the exact answers, but hope to have a better idea how to improve educational events for attorneys for the future.

Perhaps lawyers would like bow tie tying panel.

Your Honor, Your Honor

With due regard for Caddyshack, we were very honored to have an honorable mention by The Geekie Awards for our “fireside chat” podcast with Judge Matthew Sciarrino. I will attend the awards show on August 18 and look forward to meeting the extremely talented geek nominees and judges.

Which brings us to the ABA Journal Blawg 100. Nominations are now open and close on August 9 at 700pm EST.  If you enjoy our blog, please nominate us for the ABA Journal Blawg 100.

Again, thank you for a great Year One. I look forward to Year Two.

The Legal Geeks’ First Year: Oh what a year!

0
Close-up of a vampire zombie in mid attack.

I can’t believe I’ve been a Legal Geek for a year already (I’ve been a dork for decades more)!  I wasn’t sure what to expect when Josh and I started this adventure last summer but I have to say it’s been more exciting than I could have anticipated.  While it’s all been great, below are some of my personal highlights from my first year as a Legal Geek:

Josh_Reading_Countdown

Meeting and working with my geeky partner, Josh.  Josh is a ton of fun and I’ve learned more from him about US Presidents than I learned in high school.  Plus, he’s one of the most creative attorneys I know (certainly far more creative than I am), so I always enjoy reading his posts!

io9!  I still remember where I was when I found out io9 was going to publish my piece on judicial opinions with Star Trek references (I was at the Dells with my little girl, who wasn’t impressed).  I’ve been a fan of io9 for a long time so it was a personal highlight to have something I wrote on that website.  Plus, I was very impressed by the judges’ creativity.

Gavel

And speaking of creative judges, I’m so glad I’ve had the opportunity to meet and talk with some great judges through this blog, especially Judge Sciarrino.  I met him at a conference in Park City and we’ve done some fun video posts together.  He’s creative, clever, and I’ve never met anyone else who knows as much about Star Wars.

Close-up of a vampire zombie in mid attack.

 

Letting my geek colors fly!  Having the opportunity to talk about some of my favorite shows, books, and movies is awesome.  I’m a huge fan of Buffy, Veronica Mars, Robert Heinlein, John Carter, Terry Pratchett, Star Trek, and many more sci-fi authors and shows.  And I know this may be hard to believe, but I don’t get to talk about this stuff much in my ordinary life.

Finally, as my friends and family know, I’m obsessed with Howard Stern and his show.  So when one of my favorite Stern Show producers actually retweeted my post – and then I got to have a brief Twitter conversation with him – I was over the moon with excitement.  Even my kids were excited for me that time!