Home Blog Page 120

The Legal Geeks: Year One

0
Gavel

JoshToast_0852Thank you everyone for a very successful first year of The Legal Geeks.

Our adventure began last year when Jessica Mederson and I met over Tweeting my Bow Tie Law post Cowboys & Lawyers: Spaghetti Western eDiscovery.

Since that time, we have had a wonderful adventure across the legal issues in science fiction, comic books and pop culture.

Needless to say, I also have had a blast in going action figure and t-shirt shopping for “research.”

Rise of the Geek Lawyers

I have learned there are a substantial number of geek attorneys and in the United States. I was first alerted to this when a partner at a Big Law firm asked over lunch, “Hey, do you have the lightsaber app for your iPhone?”

How did the number of “geek” lawyers come to be?

Today, we have a substantial number of attorneys and judges from Generation X and Generation Y. We grew up with Gene Roddenberry/George Lucas/Steven Spielberg enriched childhoods. The stories from our youth that made a significant impact, from “I have been and always will be your friend” to “Throw me the idol, I’ll throw you the whip,” were truly important to many of us. We spent countless hours in the backyard with space ships and action figures. These were defining happy moments. Those memories without question would echo throughout our lives and practice of law.

So for every attorney who has considered making a Battlestar Galactica or X Files references in a points and authority, you are not alone.

Geek Discovery

The Legal Geeks has allowed me to go boldly beyond blogging about eDiscovery. In the past year, I have been able to research prenuptial agreements and the 6th Amendment right to counsel. Some of my favorite posts this year have included:

Han’s Legal Justification for Shooting Greedo First

Doctor Who & The Effect of Regenerations on the Validity of a Will

Assumption of Risk & Red Shirts on Star Trek

Jabba the Hutt & Employee Safety

Firefly & Lessons in Contract Law

I especially want to thank io9 for picking up my Firefly post and Above the Law for sharing multiple posts. I appreciate all of the Tweets and Facebook shares.

No, There is Another

JessicaMederson_9018Jessica Mederson is a wonderful blogging partner. A smart lawyer who has read the classic science fiction books for the last century, she was also into vampires before they were sparkling moody teenagers. Her post on judges who quoted Star Trek in opinions was brilliant and picked up by io9.

Jess has been a very good sport about podcasting in Sci Fi t-shirts and debating the finer points of legal geekdom.

We had an excellent adventure at the Paraben Forensic Innovation Conference and got to work with many other talented attorneys.

You Be The Judge

One of the greatest highlights this year has been getting to know Judge Matthew Sciarrino. He is a true civil servant who puts in long hours for the people of New York. People know of the newsworthy criminal cases he has presided over.

Gavel-on-White-SepiaWhat the Judge does not get credit for was checking on his courthouse after the damage caused by Hurricane Sandy and performing a marriage ceremony for a couple.

No power, people struggling to get back to normal after the storm and Judge Sciarrino took the time to do something kind: performed a wedding ceremony for two people trying to get married.

Judges across the country do similar quiet good works. I have seen many local judges volunteer for the county high school mock trial tournament. There are many other examples as well.  Their contributions to society are usually done without fanfare, but are not be forgotten by those they help.

In the past year, I also had the good fortune to spend time with Magistrate Judge John Facciola, moderated a panel with District Judge David Nuffer and had a blast with our anniversary podcast with Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal this year. I really cannot state how much I respect our judges. They work hard to uphold the Constitution and their service to country is very appreciated.

Oh, The Places You’ll Go

I attended the Alternative Press Expo and Big Wow! Comics Convention this year. In my opinion, attorneys attend legal conferences because they have to; people attend comic/geek conventions because they want to. I would like to find how we can make legal conferences events lawyers want to attend.

Presenting on Assumption of Risk & Red Shirts at PFIC
Presenting on Assumption of Risk & Red Shirts at PFIC

Part of the answer lies in the type of panel discussions that are held at conferences. The “geek” shows offer big names on topics and “how to” panels. While a Clarance Darrow cosplay panel would not likely be useful, focusing on how to conduct expert depositions, how to propound discovery requests for social media, or even how to balance billable hours to raising a family might be good starting points for conference organizers.

I am not sure the exact answers, but hope to have a better idea how to improve educational events for attorneys for the future.

Perhaps lawyers would like bow tie tying panel.

Your Honor, Your Honor

With due regard for Caddyshack, we were very honored to have an honorable mention by The Geekie Awards for our “fireside chat” podcast with Judge Matthew Sciarrino. I will attend the awards show on August 18 and look forward to meeting the extremely talented geek nominees and judges.

Which brings us to the ABA Journal Blawg 100. Nominations are now open and close on August 9 at 700pm EST.  If you enjoy our blog, please nominate us for the ABA Journal Blawg 100.

Again, thank you for a great Year One. I look forward to Year Two.

The Legal Geeks’ First Year: Oh what a year!

0
Close-up of a vampire zombie in mid attack.

I can’t believe I’ve been a Legal Geek for a year already (I’ve been a dork for decades more)!  I wasn’t sure what to expect when Josh and I started this adventure last summer but I have to say it’s been more exciting than I could have anticipated.  While it’s all been great, below are some of my personal highlights from my first year as a Legal Geek:

Josh_Reading_Countdown

Meeting and working with my geeky partner, Josh.  Josh is a ton of fun and I’ve learned more from him about US Presidents than I learned in high school.  Plus, he’s one of the most creative attorneys I know (certainly far more creative than I am), so I always enjoy reading his posts!

io9!  I still remember where I was when I found out io9 was going to publish my piece on judicial opinions with Star Trek references (I was at the Dells with my little girl, who wasn’t impressed).  I’ve been a fan of io9 for a long time so it was a personal highlight to have something I wrote on that website.  Plus, I was very impressed by the judges’ creativity.

Gavel

And speaking of creative judges, I’m so glad I’ve had the opportunity to meet and talk with some great judges through this blog, especially Judge Sciarrino.  I met him at a conference in Park City and we’ve done some fun video posts together.  He’s creative, clever, and I’ve never met anyone else who knows as much about Star Wars.

Close-up of a vampire zombie in mid attack.

 

Letting my geek colors fly!  Having the opportunity to talk about some of my favorite shows, books, and movies is awesome.  I’m a huge fan of Buffy, Veronica Mars, Robert Heinlein, John Carter, Terry Pratchett, Star Trek, and many more sci-fi authors and shows.  And I know this may be hard to believe, but I don’t get to talk about this stuff much in my ordinary life.

Finally, as my friends and family know, I’m obsessed with Howard Stern and his show.  So when one of my favorite Stern Show producers actually retweeted my post – and then I got to have a brief Twitter conversation with him – I was over the moon with excitement.  Even my kids were excited for me that time!

Steampunk Ghostbusting with Madeleine Holly-Rosing

0

Josh and Jessica interview Madeleine Holly-Rosing, author of the Boston Metaphysical Society.

Thoughts on Independence Day & The Third Amendment

0

All men are created equal.

Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776

JoshCampaignHat_0799One of my motivations for becoming an attorney was my love of country.

Celebrating our Declaration of Independence on the 4th of July has always been very important to me (Just as is Constitution Day).

Not because of memories of my grandfather making homemade ice cream by hand, fireworks in front of our house or marching in the local parade as a youth.

Those things made up my American Experience.

My love of the 4th of July is heavily fueled by my love of history. From the events of 1763 to the Declaration of Independence; from to the Federalist Papers to the United States Constitution and ultimately the Bill of Rights, essentially define American life in the United States. The story of how all came about have been the subject of many books, each with great leaders who will be remembered as long as we have a country.

Nature throws us all into the world equal and alike…the only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man [kings included] to endanger public liberty.

 

John Adams, from his notes on an oration at Braintree, quoted in John Adams, by David McCullough, page 121.

On Being a History Geek

I took enough upper division history classes at UC Davis for a mini major in United States history. Our history has many heroes who did the hard work to build a free nation. They literally put their lives on the line for a free nation to be born.

Do you recollect the pensive and awful silence which pervaded the house when we were called up, one after another, to the table of the President of the Congress to subscribe what was believed by many at that time to be our own death warrants?

Benjamin Rush, letter to John Adams, 1781, The Essential Wisdom of the Founding Fathers, edited by Carol Kelly-Gangi

We value our freedom from government intervention with our lives. Perhaps the most overlooked evidence of this national value is the Third Amendment to the US Constitution. Few people EVER hear mention of this Amendment, but it expressly forbids the quartering of soldiers in private homes. The Third Amendment expressly states:

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

The United States simply has not quartered soldiers in private homes because of our Revolutionary experience from the British soldiers being unwanted house guests. There is barely any case law of the Third Amendment, simply because the US Army has not forced soldiers into the homes of citizens to be fed and housed. We don’t do that here.

The Third Amendment highlights one of our fundamental beliefs in country: to be free of an oppressive police state. This is paramount for anyone to have “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Moreover, the Third Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights creating a “penumbra of privacy” as cited in Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 484 (U.S. 1965).

The Third Amendment might be one of the forgotten amendments, but it certainly demonstrates our values of a free society.

On Service to Country

Every post is honorable in which a man can serve his country.

George Washington, Letter to Benedict Arnold, September 14, 1775, The Essential Wisdom of the Founding Fathers, edited by Carol Kelly-Gangi

Our country is free because of those willing to defend it.

I have many friends who serve in the military. I know many who serve the public trust as district attorneys, public defenders, county counsel and judges. To everyone who took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, thank you.

…and Third Amendment notwithstanding, there are very few Americans who would not be proud to invite someone serving in the military over to join in a 4th of July celebration.

Book Review: John Carter and the Gods of Hollywood

0

I love John Carter, as is well-documented.  I’m also fascinated with inside Hollywood stories, so I had to read John Carter and the Gods of HollywoodThis book by a Hollywood filmmaker examines why this movie did so poorly at the box office.

As I discussed last year, I was pleasantly surprised by the movie when I finally watched it.  In fact, after seeing it, I was disappointed that it had been written off as such a disaster.  And that meant we probably won’t be getting any sequels.  So, given all that, I had to read Michael Sellers’ book just to find out what the heck happened to my beloved John Carter!

Warrior Man of MarsThe book starts off with some great background on Burroughs himself, along with Hollywood’s interest in his other creation, Tarzan.  Then it goes into the early efforts to put John Carter on the big screen.  While Tarzan worked well on film, trying to replicate Barsoom and its inhabitants wasn’t feasible for most of the 20th Century (although there was some early talk of doing an animated film).

Robert Rodriguez and Jon Favreau were both attached to direct a John Carter movie when Paramount had the film rights a decade ago, which they had purchased from the family company started in 1923 to protect Burroughs’ creations, Edgar Rice Burroughs Inc. (“ERB”).  Nothing ever came of these efforts, however, and the rights reverted to ERB.  But then Andrew Stanton, of Finding Nemo fame, talked Disney into acquiring the rights and letting him direct the $250 million epic.

Fast forward to the marketing for the movie.  Sellers spends much of his book detailing Disney’s failed efforts – and, more importantly, its general lack of effort – to market the movie.  At times, his book reads like a textbook on social marketing.  He also details his attempts, through his website, www.thejohncarterfiles.com, to make up for Disney’s feeble marketing.  He and a friend made a fan trailer that was better than the official trailers.  They even highlighted the fact that everyone from George Lucas to James Cameron has poached Edgar Rice Burroughs’ legacy with a great slogan: The epic tale that inspired 100 years of filmmaking.

Throughout the book runs a theme of hopefulness – the author keeps thinking that he or Disney will do something to turn around the impending disaster, although we all know nothing worked (which makes the constant dreams of a turnaround in the book a bit annoying).  The book even ends with one last wish – that the fans could join together and inspire a sequel.

I’d love a sequel but I don’t hold out much hope that it will happen after what Disney did to the first John Carter movie – a travesty Sellers documents well in his book.  My only complaints about his book have to do with the editing – there were too many typos and the book was far too long.  He could have cut out much of the detail on the social media front, along with multiple pages he included of cut and paste comments from online sources, without hurting his story.

Mars: The Red PlanetOn the legal side, it’s interesting to see that ERB is still effectively using the law to protect John Carter.  Having been written over a hundred years ago, A Princess of Mars is in the public domain.  That’s because, under U.S. copyright law, any works published before 1923 are now in the public domain.  Generally, works published now are protected for 70 years after the death of the author, although there are exceptions.  So Burroughs’ early works are now in the public domain, while the rest of his works are only protected through 2020 (seventy years after his death in 1950).  This only applies to the US, however.  In other countries, such as Great Britain, ERB still has copyright protection for all of Burroughs’ stories.

But because its US copyright protection is rapidly eroding, ERB is now turning to trademark law to protect its marks – John Carter and Tarzan primary among them – in order to keep profiting from Burroughs’ genius.  Last year it filed suit against a comic book distributor, alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition – not copyright infringement.  If only ERB could have sued Disney for bungling the marketing of the John Carter movie!

 

The Web Series Research: Case Studies of What Not To Do At Work

0

Let’s be clear about one thing: my brother Gabe Diani is in Research, so this is a mild tale of nepotism.

Each episode of Research could provide law professors hours of exam questions for law students.  It should give Employment Lawyers nightmares that result in them carrying whiskey flasks to client meetings. Uncontrollable laughter is also foreseeable.

Let’s review the highlights of the main legal issues presented in the first two episodes.

Episode 1: The Pilot

Episode 2: Secretariat

Let’s Poison a Test Subject

Taking a room full of test subjects and telling them one might drink poison raises many legal issues. The obvious is murder, because a poison is being used to kill a person (California Penal Code section 189). This demonstrates malice aforethought to kill a test subject and clearly is first degree murder, regardless of whether or not a specific test subject is the target of the poison.

There would also be significant issues of intention inflection of emotional distress by telling test subjects that there is a poison in one of the test cups. While there would need to be waivers of liability to participate in any research study, one cannot willfully try to torture people. There is simply no waiver of liability for torture.

Taylor’s Sexual Harassment of Dave

An attractive woman randomly kissing a supervisor might be common on late night cable, but it is sexual harassment in the real world. To prove sexual harassment, Dave would must demonstrate the following:

1. That Dave had a business, service, or professional relationship with Taylor; and

2. That Taylor made sexual advances to Dave.

Alternatively, Dave could prove under California law that:

1.  Taylor engaged in verbal, visual, and physical conduct of a sexual nature;

2. Taylor’s conduct was unwelcome and also pervasive or severe;

3. Dave was unable to easily end the relationship with Taylor; and

4. That Dave has suffered or will suffer the violation of a statutory or constitutional right as a result of Taylor’s conduct.

5-30 California Forms of Jury Instruction 3065.

Contrary to Taylor saying it was not sexual harassment when a “woman does it,” Taylor could be found to have sexually harassed Dave, because the law is not limited on which gender can sexually harass the other. (The law even provides protection against same gender harassment, See Singleton v. United States Gypsum Co., 140 Cal. App. 4th 1547, 1548 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2006)).

There was uninvited kissing and verbal comments. Moreover, Taylor waiting in the conference room boarders on stalking Dave. All of these facts would show a repeated pattern of harassment of Dave or at a minimum stalking.

Job Posting on JDate

Research also raises issues of religious discrimination by posting a job ad on JDate, showing a preference for Jewish employees at the expense of qualified non-Jewish candidates (not to mention a high degree of cultural insensitivity). The California Constitution specifically prohibits disqualifying a person from employment based upon their religion. Cal Const, Art. I § 8.

There is an exception to the above, because a religious employer has discretion to select employees who will not interfere with their religious mission. Silo v. CHW Med. Found. (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1097, 1108-1109 applying U.S. Const., Amend. I; Cal. Const., art. I, § 4 to Cal. Const., art. I, § 8. As the team on Research has nothing to do with a religious mission, this hiring practice could result in a lawsuit.

Physical Battery by Dr. Rust

Dr. Rust slapped Dave across the face. There is also facial touching of both receptionists.

Battery under California Penal Code section 242 is “is any willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon the person of another.” Dr. Rust slapping Dave would unquestionably be battery, resulting in civil and criminal liability. It is also a terminable offense from employment.

The touching of both receptionists’ faces would be unlawful touching as well. While not the same physical force as a slap, it is extremely creepy behavior that could result in a lawsuit.

This says nothing of giving Kate face melting acid.

Who Handled the Blood Sample?

Performing blood draws and the storing of blood is a heavily regulated profession. (See, Cal Bus & Prof Code § 1242 and Cal Health & Saf Code § 7150.10). The team at Research could not simply leave a large bottle of blood out in the open brought in by a test subject.

Sexual Discrimination in Hiring

Grant’s mandate for Dave to hire a “hot chick” would be several forms of sexual discrimination. First, it eliminates all qualified men who applied for the position. Second, it discriminates against women based solely on appearance, whether or not they are skilled to do the job. Third, it invites unlawful future sexual harassment of the new hire. The mandate is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

There Are Even More Issues

Research is a law professor’s dream on possible legal issues. These are only the first two episodes and just the tip of the iceberg on possible liability for the fictional company.

Indiana Jones & The Headpiece of Partnership Formation

0

I’m your goddamn partner!

Marion Ravenwood

LisaIndy_0353_PostRaiders of the Lost Ark asks the age old question: Can a bar fight with Nazi henchmen that causes the destruction of the bar result in partnership formation with the former bar owner?

What fiduciary duty is owed between partners on an adventure to find rare antiquities?

Partnership formation can happen without warning, like a giant bolder crashing down upon you.

Or darts shooting out of walls.

All the essential elements for a partnership needed under Connecticut law, home of Marshall College, is “the association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners of a business for profit forms a partnership, whether or not the persons intend to form a partnership. . . .” Hirschfeld v. Hirschfeld, 50 Conn. App. 280, 287 (Conn. App. Ct. 1998), citing Conn. General Statutes § 34-314.

Let’s put on our fedoras and get out the bullwhips, because it is time to analyze the partnership issues in Raiders of the Lost Ark.

Throw Me The Idol & I’ll Breach My Fiduciary Duty

Indy-Alyssa_9946What fiduciary duty was owed by Satipo to Indiana at the Temple of the Chachapoyan Warriors?

Indiana Jones contracted with Satipo for assistance in finding the Chachapoyan Fertility Idol.

Satipo arguably was in a partnership with Jones because of the business venture from the History Museum to find the Idol.

As such, Satipo would have owed Jones the fiduciary duties of loyalty and care. Conn. Sec. 34-338.

These duties include an accounting to the “partnership and hold as trustee for it any property, profit or benefit derived by the partner in the conduct…” and avoid having adverse interests to the partnership. Conn. Sec. 34-338(b)(1) and (b)(2).

Satipo telling Jones to “throw me the Idol, I’ll throw you the whip” while they were trying to escape was a breach of his duty of loyalty to Jones. Moreover, Satipo not throwing over the whip was not only a breach of his duty, but an improper partnership dissolution, because he attempted to steal the Idol for himself (the same can be said for the former partner Barranca, who also breached his duty of loyalty by pulling a gun on Jones).

Alternatively, if there was not a partnership because Satipo was simply an independent contractor, he would have breached his contractual obligations by trying to demand the Idol for the whip for Indiana to escape.

You Still Remember How To Show A Lady A Good Time

LisaIndy_9898Indiana Jones, an independent contractor for the US government, traveled to Nepal to purchase Headpiece to the Staff of Ra from Abner Ravenwood.

Jones negotiated with Marion Ravenwood for the Headpiece to the Staff of Ra for $3,000 cash, plus another $2,000 when they returned to the United States.

Marion kept the $3,000 cash.

After a Nazi thug bar fight resulting in the destruction of Marion’s bar and the $3,000 cash, Marion held up the Headpiece and said, “I am your goddamn partner!”

Would Indiana and Marion have a valid legal partnership?

Based on the statute and case law, yes.

You and I Are Merely Passing Through Partnership Formation…This, this IS Partnership Formation

A partnership is “the association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit forms a partnership, whether or not the persons intend to form a partnership.” Conn. Sec. 34-314(a). Moreover, a “person who receives a share of the profits of a business is presumed to be a partner in the business…” Conn. Sec. 34-314(c)(3).

Marion’s participation in the partnership with Jones was for the fee of 1) $5,000 in exchange for, 2) the Headpiece to the Staff of Ra, so 3) Jones could find the Ark of the Covenant for the United States government in the Well of Souls.

3d render of ark of the covenantThe partnership would be a valid partnership, despite the lack of a written partnership agreement. As one Court explained:

A partnership is a contractual relation, which may be implied from conduct and circumstances alone. See 59A Am. Jur. 2d Partnership § 89. Connecticut General Statutes § 34-314(a) defines the formation of a partnership as follows: “the association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit forms a partnership, whether or not the persons intend to form a partnership.” The elements of a partnership as expressed by the courts, generally include,an association of persons to combine property, money, effects, skill, and knowledge under a contract or agreement to carry out a lawful business enterprise for profit; co-ownership of the business enterprise; the conduct or contemplation of business activity; a community of interest in the business profits, management, and control; and the sharing of profits and losses from the business enterprise.

Balzer v. Millward, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43355, 8-9 (D. Conn. Apr. 21, 2011).

The Jones-Ravenwood partnership was the blending of Marion’s property and Jones’ skill to locate the Ark of the Covenant for the United States, with Marion getting $5,000 (which adjusted for inflation from 1936 would be $81,741.62 in 2012 for the bronze headpiece). All of this conduct demonstrated a valid partnership between the parties.

The Man is Nefarious

Marion Ravenwood was the legal owner of the Headpiece to the Staff of Ra. Marion’s father lawfully found it as a treasure trove, because King Shishak had been dead since approximately 979 or 978 BC, thus waiving any claim to the headpiece.

As such, would the Jones-Ravenwood partnership have a copyright claim against the Nazi Major Arnold Toht for unlawfully copying one side of the headpiece?

Eight commandment, thou shalt not steal

Possibly, but the issue is moot, because Toht melted from the wrath of God. Moreover, violating at least half of the 10 Commandments before opening the Ark of the Covenant would superseded any copyright claims.

The Adventures Continues

The legal adventures of Indiana Jones do not end there. Another time we will explore child endangerment in Temple of Doom, destruction of public property in Last Crusade and back child-support in Crystal Skull.