Home Blog Page 101

Big Wow ComicFest 2014 (Day 1)

0

The 2014 Big Wow ComicFest kicked off on May 17 in San Jose. Day 1 was fantastic, giving me a chance to catch up with people I met last year, enjoy sessions, and pick up material for future blog posts. I was extremely impressed by all of the cosplayers, from the GI Joes, to Cobra, to Ghostbusters, to Star Wars, and the other many different aspects of geek culture being celebrated at Big Wow.

The show has the Batman Museum, celebrating the Cape Crusader’s 75th Anniversary. I enjoyed catching out the original Batmobile (which probably would be awesome at a future Geekie Awards). Batmobile_2739 I had a serious geek moment going to the panel discussion with William Katt, whom I enjoyed greatly as a child on The Greatest American Hero.

WilliamKatt_2747The showed first aired after my parents divorced and my mother went to paramedic school in Los Angeles. I lived with my grandparents during that time.

Ralph’s adventures as the hero without the instruction book for his alien suit were a bright part of each week.

A few years ago, I gave the collectors edition DVD set to both my brother and cousin for Christmas, who hold the show in the same regard as I. My brother might still have his cape.

Katt discussed many cool stories from his childhood to present day. He discussed one of his recent projects called A Man from Earth, which was a very intellectual science fiction show about a man who had lived for 10,000 years. The story focuses on scientists who are questioning the 10,000 year old man in an attempt to verify his claims. I look forward to checking it.

Josh_WilliamKatt_2756I had the chance to visit with the extremely creative cosplayer Vegas PG. I met her last year and yes, I have one of her autographed photos on the wall. She has a fun Facebook Fan Page, where she posts about comic conventions, gaming, and whether it is National Chocolate Chip Cookie Day.

Vegas_PG_2758I picked up a lot of great independent comics and look forward to blogging about them in the near future, including Boston Metaphysical Society Issue 3 and Oh, Hell.

Until then, let’s get ready for Day 2.

DarthVader_2744

 

Can HYDRA’s Cybertek Employees Argue They Acted Under Duress?

0

HYDRA Head John Garrett in the Agents of SHIELD season finale showed he truly had an organization with many heads. Cybertek, located in New Mexico, had employees who were acting as the handles for the soldiers with the explosive eye implants. These Cybertek employees provided instructions over a computer connect to the soldiers’ bionic eyes. In the event of non-compliance, the Cybertek employee could detonate the explosive eye-ball in a soldier.

HYDRA_Duress_1995The Cybertek employees were a mix of “volunteers” (HYDRA) and those who joined for the “Incentive Program.” This program was code for kidnapping a loved one and threatening harm for non-compliance with a HYDRA order.

Could the Cybertek employees argue they were operating under duress or the necessity defense? Could the soldiers in the field? What if the soldier killed someone or a Cybertek employee killed a soldier with his explosive eye?

Both Cybertek employees and the soldiers could argue they were only do they actions under duress. And this could work, unless someone was killed by the direct actions of the defendant.

Duress is the threat of harm made to compel a person to do something against his will. See, Black’s Law Dictionary App, 9th Edition. However, duress is a “defense as to all crimes except taking the life of an innocent person. . . .” McMillan v. State, 428 Md. 333, 351 (Md. 2012).

No one at Cybertek who detonated a soldier’s explosive eye could argue the duress defense, because a defendant cannot kill someone and argue they murdered under duress. State v. Nieto, 129 N.M. 688, 694 (N.M. 2000). The same could be said for soldiers in the field who are killing innocents upon threat of their eye exploding.

Cybertek employees MIGHT have a successful duress argue if they soldier they were providing instructions to, killed someone. In a case where a defendant was forced to participate in a robbery, and then those who caused the duress killed someone without the defendant’s involvement, the defendant could argue duress in those circumstances. McMillan v. State, 428 Md. 333, 351 (Md. 2012). Similarly, a Cybertek employee could argue that they were forced to provide assistance to HYDRA under duress and since they did not pull the trigger, they were not directly involved in murder. While there is no excuse for killing innocents to save one’s own life, there is a chance they could argue duress in those limited circumstances. Also a high chance it will fail.

The soldier on the other hand who killed people would have no duress defense.

Trip Can Bring the Funk, We’ll Bring the Law

0

Agents of SHIELD had a great season finale. Issues first presented in the pilot were tied up with a rewarding amount of action.

Excellent_Season2_1957But what about the legal issues? Could the Agents just get a free pass and pardons for being vigilantes? Could Agent Coulson torture Ward [Agent of HYDRA]? Could former Director Nick Fury make Agent Coulson the new Director of SHIELD? Plus, on whose authority were they arresting people?

Jessica Mederson and Josh Gilliland explore these issue and much more in the Agents of SHIELD Season Finale Podcast.

The Odds Are Against You With Video Gambling in Bars

0

Friday Night At BarTGIF! It’s Friday night and, if you’re going out to a bar this weekend, remember three things:

(1) don’t drink and drive; (2) don’t buy anyone’s lines; and (3) if you play the video poker machines, know that the odds are against you.

 

Poker is in the news this week (for those of us obsessed with celebrity gossip) because Ben Affleck supposedly just got banned for life from playing blackjack at the Hard Rock Casino (he’s that good at counting cards).  And there’s often a connection between lawyers and poker, although I’m so bad at all forms of gambling I’ve never understood that link.

Slot MachineBut there are other links between gambling and lawyers, usually when someone needs legal advice.  Like when a drinking buddy of a friend tells me about his video poker dispute with the local bar.  He won more than $500 playing on the machines but the bar wasn’t paying up and he was wondering if there was anything he could do.

The problem, at least in the great state of Wisconsin, is that those video poker (and slot) machines are illegal in bars.  See WI Stat. Sec. 945.035.  But it’s a weird kind of illegal: if bars have five or less machines it’s only a misdemeanor and apparently there’s no prosecution for that misdemeanor.  If a bar has more than five machines, it’s a felony and it can be prosecuted (if it’s done the right way, with the right officials).

PoliceBadgeThat means a lot of Wisconsin bars have these machines even though they’re technically illegal.  And that’s bad news for everyone involved.  If somebody uses the machines to scam the bars, the bars don’t have much of a legal remedy.  That’s also true if somebody plays the machines and “wins” but the bar refuses to pay up.  Prosecutors and the police aren’t going to spend a lot of time helping people, or businesses, who got screwed over.

Sometimes the cops will help, but there isn’t a lot prosecutors can or will do to help people and businesses who are doing something illegal.  Just ask Boy George – sometimes you can end up in trouble when you call for help if you’re doing something illegal!  And sometimes the cops will seize a bar’s machines as contraband because they’re illegal machines, even if the bars never intended to pay out on their customers’ wins anyway (that’s karma!).  See In re Return of Prop., 2002 WI App 79, 252 Wis. 2d 604, 611 (holding that the police did not need to return video slot machines because they were illegal, even though the bar never paid out any money).

So if you’re in a bar and looking for a way to pass the time, go ahead and play on those machines but don’t expect to win anything.  It’s just another way to spend some money and pass the time while you check out that cutie across the bar!

Gerry O’Brien on Agents of SHIELD & Agent Carter

0

SHIELD_HYDRA_Hearings_8673New York Political Consultant Gerry O’Brien, author of the steampunk novel 1901, is a long time Nick Fury and SHIELD fan. Gerry and Josh sat down to discuss the Agents of SHIELD episode “Ragtag,” covering the political and legal issues that have developed since Captain America Winter Soldier. Both are thrilled to have an Agent Carter series and shared their hopes about the new show.

The Following Constitutional Issues Take Place Between 1106am to 1200pm

0

24LogoJack is Back! The action on 24 is awesome. And right out of the gate, we have large Constitutional issues.

President James Heller is showing memory problems. Whether he has the early stages of Alzheimer or some dementia, this calls in his ability to serve as President. A lot would depend on whether it impairs him from carrying out his duties.

President Heller’s disease could trigger whether he has an “Inability to Discharge the Powers and Duties” of the President, creating issues under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution and the 25 Amendment.

Presidents have to remember little things like nuclear launch codes, let alone the names of Congressmen, foreign leaders and talking points. If Heller is having medical problems more serious than mixing up Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt in sending the Great White Fleet around the world, there could be a real inability to serve. However, if his condition is keeping him off Jeopardy, probably not.

The story includes references to Heller running for President “four years ago.” This would put him well into his first term. The development of the disease at a minimum would keep him from running for a second term. Whether or not he could finish his first term would depend on the nature of the disease.

Should President Heller resign? Not yet from the first two hours, but the answer depends on his health. However, the knowledge of his disease could trigger the Vice President taking over as President under the 25th Amendment and Presidential Succession Act.

Now, about that Chief of Staff/Son-in-Law issuing orders from the President, there is nothing in the Constitution giving him the authority to do so….

Ragtag Legal Lessons from Agents of SHIELD

0

Agents of SHIELD is drawing to an excellent season finale. Here are legal issues from Ragtag.

Doing the Right Thing vs Vigilantes

Agent Fitz admitted the operations the Agents are carrying out makes them vigilantes. Agent Coulson countered he called it “doing the right thing.” The “doing the right thing” has been the core of the posts Vigilantes of SHIELD and Flying Lola in the Face of Orders. More importantly, Coulson’s motivation to “be the shield” has been an excellent moral justification for being of SHIELD.

Agent Coulson and his team are breaking the law, but they have a very strong “necessity defense,” because they are trying to stop greater crimes from happening. Moreover, there is no other course of action for them to take. Additionally, they have broken multiple laws in conducting law enforcement activities, but they have not taken the lives of anyone in law enforcement, the military or civilians. That still shows they are acting in the nation’s best interests and not outright committing treason.

Who is Cybertek’s Records Information Management Officer?

Cybertek would throw the Silicon Valley world of electronically stored information on its head by only maintaining paper records and not having any electronic data.

HYDRA_InfoGov_Email_9483For all of the attorneys who wish to avoid text messages, social media and email in litigation, Cybertek is the right client for you.

Just be highly skilled at defending charges ranging from treason to unlawful human medical experimentation.

There are over 14,000 records retention laws in the United States. Knowing which ones apply to a company is how general counsel earn their paychecks. Companies struggle with data managements, archiving, and preserving data they are legally required to maintain under the law or for business reasons.

That being said, Cybertek is not an anomaly for having paper documents going back to 1990. There are technology companies in Silicon Valley that have paper documents from the 1980s appearing in patent cases. That is not abnormal. What is highly strange would be a tech company in Palo Alto without computers.

Can We Get Haircuts in Cuba?

Cuba has the distinction of making Theodore Roosevelt a hero, a rare Presidential trip and speech by Calvin Coolidge, the Bay of Pigs, and being ground zero for almost starting World War III in 1962. For many foreign policy reasons, Cuba has been embargoed in a grudge match with the United States.

It would be very difficult for our heroes from SHIELD to drop in on Cuba for a day trip, without the risk of war. Moreover, a secret HYDRA base under a barber shop would not help Cuba’s relations with the United States.

Travel to Cuba is highly regulated for specific reasons. Tourist travel is prohibited. 31 CFR 515.560(F). General and specific travel licenses can be granted to those subject to US jurisdiction to Cuba for the following activities:

(1)  Family visits (general and specific licenses) (See § 515.561);
(2)  Official business of the U.S. government, foreign governments, and certain intergovernmental organizations (general license) (see § 515.562);
(3)  Journalistic activity (general and specific licenses) (see § 515.563);
(4)  Professional research and professional meetings (general and specific licenses) (See § 515.564);
(5)  Educational activities (general and specific licenses) (See § 515.565);
(6)  Religious activities (general and specific licenses) (See § 515.566);
(7)  Public performances, clinics, workshops, athletic and other competitions, and exhibitions (specific licenses) (See § 515.567);
(8)  Support for the Cuban people (specific licenses) (see § 515.574);
(9)  Humanitarian projects (specific licenses) (see § 515.575);

31 CFR 515.560.

SHIELD_CubaAgent Coulson and his team’s travel to Cuba would violate US law, as they could not apply for a license, and also Cuba’s rights as a nation. Most countries do not approve of rogue former spies doing the “right thing” in a paramilitary operation.

It also should be noted, getting a haircut and shave is not on the list.

In the unlikely event Agent Coulson and his fellow agents coordinated with the Cuban government, they would likely violate the Logan Act. This law prohibits US citizens effectively having their own foreign policy agreements with the “intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government” that are “in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States.” 18 USCS § 953. Given the nature of the relations with Cuba, and the likely negative reaction from the US with HYDRA launching operations from Cuba into the United States, the Logan Act might be violated if Coulson coordinated with Cuba. However, this seems highly unlikely.

Don’t Make Me Go Old Yeller

Garrett should not be allowed around children. Or Dogs.

There is no question that John Garrett “liberating” Grant Ward from juvenile hall would have been child abduction.  Massachusetts law states:

Whoever, without lawful authority, forcibly or secretly confines or imprisons a child under the age of 16 within the commonwealth against his will or forcibly carries or sends such person out of the commonwealth or forcibly seizes and confines or inveigles or kidnaps a child under the age of 16 with the intent either to cause him to be secretly confined or imprisoned in the commonwealth against his will or to cause him to be sent out of the commonwealth against his will or in any way held to service against his will, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 15 years. The provisions of the preceding sentence shall not apply to the parent of a child under 16 years of age who takes custody of such child.

ALM GL ch. 265, § 26.

Garrett arguably meets this offense, because HYDRA agents forcibly broke Ward out of juvenile hall and left Ward in the woods to fend for himself. While Ward did agree to go with Garrett, that did not also include “troops are about attack.” Moreover, leaving a minor in the woods to care for themselves would be child abuse and abandonment.

HYDRA_OldYellerOrdering Ward to kill Buddy the Dog would violate Wyoming law, which defines animal abuse, in part, as “unnecessarily… attempts to kill an animal.” Wyo. Stat. § 6-3-203(a)(ii).

Forcing Ward to kill Buddy would go far beyond Old Yeller, where our boy hero had to shoot his beloved dog infected with rabies.

Buddy’s only reason to be put down was making Ward weak by emotional attachment. If the young Ward had executed Buddy, he would have committed a crime.

And Garrett is a supreme jerk.

Too bad Ward did not feel the same loyalty to all the SHIELD Agents he killed.

It is eerie that it looked like Ward was going to kill Fitz and Simmons like Old Yeller. Instead of being in a shed, Fitz and Simmons were in a cargo pod as Ward wrestled with his feelings. However, Fitz’s puppy dog loyalty to Ward seems to have been rewarded by being dumped at sea from a survivable altitude and speed, opposed to executed like Old Yeller in a shed.

An EMP As a Weapon

Fitz might not understand how to do a fist bump, but he knew how to ruin a cyborg’s day with an electromagnetic pulse.

Was using the EMP a valid form of self-defense? Maybe. Garrett wanted Fitz and Simmons dead. While a gun was not to his head, stopping Garrett was more a tactical move to eliminate an enemy.