Home Blog Page 100

Who Pays the Clean-Up Costs for Acts of Godzilla?

0

Godzilla has a bad habit of walking through cities, shooting atomic breath through buildings and causing massive structural damage with each step.

Who pays for clean-up after the King of Monsters stomps through town? And in the new Godzilla movie, who picks up the tab for damage (or extreme urban renewal) to Honolulu, Las Vegas, and San Francisco for the rampaging Kaiju?

Ironically, each city likely will have to endure the costs for emergency services, police, and other governmental services performed in response to Godzilla and other MUTO.

Business owners in Honolulu might also be unable to recover from damage caused by Godzilla’s tsunami when he came ashore if their insurance policies excluded water damage from flooding. See, Gaffney v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27805, 1-2 (E.D. La. Apr. 7, 2008). However, if he stepped on a house, that likely is not a policy exclusion, thus recoverable.

How Did They Clean Up in 1906?

San Francisco took the most significant damage it has endured since the 1906 earthquake in Godzilla. There are no California disaster cases directly on point, but states such as New York and Ohio follow the general rule “that public expenditures made in the performance of governmental functions are not recoverable.” County of Erie v. Colgan Air, Inc., 711 F.3d 147, 150 (2d Cir. 2013). As such, counties have been unable to recover costs responding to, and cleaning up, plane crashes or damages from a blackout. These costs could include wages, overtime, fire, sanitation, and hospital personnel who performed services in response to the emergency. Id.

Godzilla_CleanUp2302

The rules change with events such as oil spills. In the event of an oil spill, many states allow the state to recover clean-up costs. State of New York v Getty Petroleum Corp., 89 A.D.3d 262, 264-265 (N.Y. App. Div. 3d Dep’t 2011).

Nuclear accidents have their own special set of rules to limit liability of a licensed nuclear power company. The 1957 Price-Anderson Act was designed to encourage the development of nuclear power and protect the public. As such, the original law limited the aggregate liability for a single nuclear incident to $ 500 million plus the amount of liability insurance  available on the private market  ($ 60 million in 1957). Nuclear power companies had to buy maximum available amount of privately underwritten public liability insurance. In the (highly likely) event a nuclear disaster exceed the amount covered by private insurance, the Federal Government would kick in an amount not to exceed $500 million. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Envtl. Study Group, 438 U.S. 59, 64-65 (1978).

Godzilla_PublicExpenditures_2434

Navigating Nuclear Liability

In the new Godzilla movie, a nuclear weapon is detonated off the coast of California. In all likelihood, given the speed of the boat (which could have been 20 knots if a pilot boat), a nuclear weapon in the megatons, and less than 5 minutes to cruise to a distance outside of the Golden Gate Bridge, the city of San Francisco should have sustained massive damage from the shock wave alone of the weapon at only a couple of nautical miles from the Golden Gate at best. Let’s not forget about the following radioactive tsunami.

While I am a lawyer and sailor, but not a weapons expert, I’d say it was a miracle of science fiction San Francisco was not flattened, given the amount of time the vessel could travel before the bomb detonated. Perhaps an actual nuclear weapons expert could determine how much radiation had to be absorbed by the MUTO nest to reduce the explosion to a survivable detonation. Additionally, how much fallout Godzilla had to absorb, so San Francisco would not have to be abandoned like Chernobyl.

Would there be any governmental liability for the detonation of the nuclear weapon? Most likely no, based on cases barring property owners from recovering damages against the Federal government for testing nuclear weapons. See, Bartholomae Corp. v. United States, 253 F.2d 716, 718 (9th Cir. Cal. 1957).

In the story, the weapon was going to be used as bait to get the monsters away from San Francisco, then detonated. After the mission fails, the military options are to either let the bomb go off in San Francisco, defuse the bomb, or get it out to sea.

No lawyer could argue letting the bomb go off in San Francisco would be a good thing. The City was a mess, but a nuclear explosion would only make it a bigger mess. Defusing the bomb turned into a physical impossibility, thus getting it away from the City was the only option.

From Russia With Love

The Russian nuclear submarine dropped off on Hawaii creates a small international problem. Warships are property of their countries, even if they were lost at sea. As such, you have a Russian nuclear warship sitting on Hawaii. The Russians would want her back for burying their lost sailors and ensuring the US did not study the ship.

The Federal government would get stuck with the bill in cleaning up a nuclear mess on Hawaii. Hopefully, the area is not too hot with radiation, thanks to the MUTO’s feeding on the reactor and weapons. Whether or not the Russians would chip in for clean up costs for the return of the vessel, or consider it a loss, or throw in a few rides to the International Space Station for free, is unknown.

History Shows Again & Again, How Nature Points Out the Folly of Men

Godzilla, King of the Monster, is a force of nature who can knock over a building. However, the City of San Francisco responding to damages caused Acts of God(zilla) would have to cover the costs themselves as the “general rule is that public expenditures made in the performance of governmental functions are not recoverable.” The good news housing should be affordable in San Francisco after reconstruction and decontamination. Bad news is everyone would have long-term heath problems.

Congress would have to pass a Godzilla-sized MUTO relief act, as it would be political suicide to not help San Francisco, Las Vegas and Honolulu rebuild. Interestingly, there likely would be a mass exodus out of San Francisco, given the level of destruction. Depending on whether or not where former San Francisco survivors moved to, this could change the political make-up of California after one election.

Rodan_Eats_FisheryAct_2388

On the bright side, the West Coast should have help in rebuilding the fishing industry, due to the tsunami Godzilla creates when he swims. The resulting damage to coastal fisheries would meet the definition of a Catastrophic Regional Fishery Disaster, because there is 1) economic losses to the fishing communities; 2) more than 1 state is affected; and 3) should qualify as a fishery resource disaster or section 308(d) of the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986 (16 U.S.C. 4107(d)).”  See, MAGNUSON-STEVENS FISHERY CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2006, 109 P.L. 479, 121 Stat. 3575, 3602.

Life after death…for celebrities, anyway.

0

“I don’t want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying.”

-Woody Allen


Michael Jackson

He performed last night…even though he is dead.  And I was totally creeped out.  I am referring, of course, to Michael Jackson’s performance at the Billboard Music Awards.  He sang, danced, and had background dancers, all despite the fact that he’s been dead for almost five years.  He’s still a great performer, which is weird to say but even odder to think about.

The entire time he sang and danced, as I watched with horrid fascination, I was also thinking of the other celebrities who still show up in our modern day world: Audrey Hepburn’s new commercial, Charlize’s hobnobbing with dead Hollywood icons, and Fred Astaire dancing with a vacuum cleaner.  How surreal would it be to know that, after we pass, others can take our image – our faces, our moves, our voices – and make us dance for their purposes (and their profit)?

Fortunately, for most of us, that isn’t much of a concern (yet).  But if you’re a celebrity, it’s a reality.  Certainly not every celebrity will be turned into a hologram, a la Michael last night, but there is the risk that their image could be used to support a business without their permission.  So what does the law have to say about that?

Just over half of the states have a “right of publicity,” which recognizes that individuals have a right to control the commercial use of their name, image, and likeness.  But not all of those states protect an individual’s publicity rights after death.  New York, for example, does not recognize a post-death right, as raised in a case involving Marilyn Monroe’s post-death publicity rights, which the Southern District of New York held did not exist.  See Shaw Family Archives Ltd. v. CMG Worldwide, Inc., 486 F.Supp.2d 309 (S.D.N.Y.  2007).  In other words, after you’re dead, you can’t stop others from using your image for their purposes.

In 1985 in California, however, an act was passed to protect celebrities’ publicity rights after death.  Known as the Astaire Celebrity Image Protection Act, it protects publicity rights post-death if certain conditions are met.  It was even amended in 2007 to specifically address the Marilyn Monroe situation, to protect celebrities who had died before the Act was passed.

So all this means that, presumably, Michael passed down his publicity rights to his heirs, which meant they were the ones who okayed Billboard pulling his strings last night.  Celebrities today must be aware of this reality – that even after they pass they will continue to be used to entertain and to sell products and services – and it’s certainly one aspect of today’s celebrity lifestyle I don’t envy.  I may fly coach and age naturally, but at least I don’t need to worry about any puppet masters making me dance after I die!

 

More Fun at Big Wow Comicfest (Day 2)

0

Big Wow Comicfest Day 2 continued the fun from Day 1. I found it highly entertaining that as I walked in on Sunday morning, the group at Rock Band was singing No Doubt’s Sunday Morning. Well played.

I had a ton of fun sitting in the Back to the Future Delorean replica by Team TimeCar. I did NOT get to see if she could do 88 MPH, but it was super cool to check it out.

BigWow_2799I attended the “Drawing Who” panel with Doctor Who comic book artists Blair D. Shedd and Josh Adams. Very talented artists who were fun and creative first thing Sunday morning.

Blair D. Shedd sang his original song “From Skaro With Hate,” a parody of From Russian With Love, as a result of getting more than 500 fans on his Facebook page. Check out his awesome performance.

There were also a ton of great cosplayers in action. I greatly admire their creativity and attention to detail in sharing their love for comics and science fiction.

Part of my admiration of cosplayers is seeing their ability to make imagination reality. It is a talent I lack, despite the fact both my father and grandfather were aeronautical engineers who had that skill, whether it was building B-17 or the Space Shuttle. While cosplayers are not building Orion to go to Mars, they are demonstrating engineering, creativity and bringing fantasy to life. You got to respect that.

BigWow_KitQuinn_2762I was especially impressed in seeing Kit Quinn become a green skinned witch. I checked in a little after 1000am and saw body paint/make-up being mixed to be sprayed on her. I went to a session and returned later to see her adding the finishing touches to her costume. The attention to detail was impressive. I hope her project the Sweethearts of the Galaxy earns a nomination for The Geekie Awards. Good luck.

Job well done on another fun day at Big Wow. I look forward to 2015.

Big Wow ComicFest 2014 (Day 1)

0

The 2014 Big Wow ComicFest kicked off on May 17 in San Jose. Day 1 was fantastic, giving me a chance to catch up with people I met last year, enjoy sessions, and pick up material for future blog posts. I was extremely impressed by all of the cosplayers, from the GI Joes, to Cobra, to Ghostbusters, to Star Wars, and the other many different aspects of geek culture being celebrated at Big Wow.

The show has the Batman Museum, celebrating the Cape Crusader’s 75th Anniversary. I enjoyed catching out the original Batmobile (which probably would be awesome at a future Geekie Awards). Batmobile_2739 I had a serious geek moment going to the panel discussion with William Katt, whom I enjoyed greatly as a child on The Greatest American Hero.

WilliamKatt_2747The showed first aired after my parents divorced and my mother went to paramedic school in Los Angeles. I lived with my grandparents during that time.

Ralph’s adventures as the hero without the instruction book for his alien suit were a bright part of each week.

A few years ago, I gave the collectors edition DVD set to both my brother and cousin for Christmas, who hold the show in the same regard as I. My brother might still have his cape.

Katt discussed many cool stories from his childhood to present day. He discussed one of his recent projects called A Man from Earth, which was a very intellectual science fiction show about a man who had lived for 10,000 years. The story focuses on scientists who are questioning the 10,000 year old man in an attempt to verify his claims. I look forward to checking it.

Josh_WilliamKatt_2756I had the chance to visit with the extremely creative cosplayer Vegas PG. I met her last year and yes, I have one of her autographed photos on the wall. She has a fun Facebook Fan Page, where she posts about comic conventions, gaming, and whether it is National Chocolate Chip Cookie Day.

Vegas_PG_2758I picked up a lot of great independent comics and look forward to blogging about them in the near future, including Boston Metaphysical Society Issue 3 and Oh, Hell.

Until then, let’s get ready for Day 2.

DarthVader_2744

 

Can HYDRA’s Cybertek Employees Argue They Acted Under Duress?

0

HYDRA Head John Garrett in the Agents of SHIELD season finale showed he truly had an organization with many heads. Cybertek, located in New Mexico, had employees who were acting as the handles for the soldiers with the explosive eye implants. These Cybertek employees provided instructions over a computer connect to the soldiers’ bionic eyes. In the event of non-compliance, the Cybertek employee could detonate the explosive eye-ball in a soldier.

HYDRA_Duress_1995The Cybertek employees were a mix of “volunteers” (HYDRA) and those who joined for the “Incentive Program.” This program was code for kidnapping a loved one and threatening harm for non-compliance with a HYDRA order.

Could the Cybertek employees argue they were operating under duress or the necessity defense? Could the soldiers in the field? What if the soldier killed someone or a Cybertek employee killed a soldier with his explosive eye?

Both Cybertek employees and the soldiers could argue they were only do they actions under duress. And this could work, unless someone was killed by the direct actions of the defendant.

Duress is the threat of harm made to compel a person to do something against his will. See, Black’s Law Dictionary App, 9th Edition. However, duress is a “defense as to all crimes except taking the life of an innocent person. . . .” McMillan v. State, 428 Md. 333, 351 (Md. 2012).

No one at Cybertek who detonated a soldier’s explosive eye could argue the duress defense, because a defendant cannot kill someone and argue they murdered under duress. State v. Nieto, 129 N.M. 688, 694 (N.M. 2000). The same could be said for soldiers in the field who are killing innocents upon threat of their eye exploding.

Cybertek employees MIGHT have a successful duress argue if they soldier they were providing instructions to, killed someone. In a case where a defendant was forced to participate in a robbery, and then those who caused the duress killed someone without the defendant’s involvement, the defendant could argue duress in those circumstances. McMillan v. State, 428 Md. 333, 351 (Md. 2012). Similarly, a Cybertek employee could argue that they were forced to provide assistance to HYDRA under duress and since they did not pull the trigger, they were not directly involved in murder. While there is no excuse for killing innocents to save one’s own life, there is a chance they could argue duress in those limited circumstances. Also a high chance it will fail.

The soldier on the other hand who killed people would have no duress defense.

Trip Can Bring the Funk, We’ll Bring the Law

0

Agents of SHIELD had a great season finale. Issues first presented in the pilot were tied up with a rewarding amount of action.

Excellent_Season2_1957But what about the legal issues? Could the Agents just get a free pass and pardons for being vigilantes? Could Agent Coulson torture Ward [Agent of HYDRA]? Could former Director Nick Fury make Agent Coulson the new Director of SHIELD? Plus, on whose authority were they arresting people?

Jessica Mederson and Josh Gilliland explore these issue and much more in the Agents of SHIELD Season Finale Podcast.

The Odds Are Against You With Video Gambling in Bars

0

Friday Night At BarTGIF! It’s Friday night and, if you’re going out to a bar this weekend, remember three things:

(1) don’t drink and drive; (2) don’t buy anyone’s lines; and (3) if you play the video poker machines, know that the odds are against you.

 

Poker is in the news this week (for those of us obsessed with celebrity gossip) because Ben Affleck supposedly just got banned for life from playing blackjack at the Hard Rock Casino (he’s that good at counting cards).  And there’s often a connection between lawyers and poker, although I’m so bad at all forms of gambling I’ve never understood that link.

Slot MachineBut there are other links between gambling and lawyers, usually when someone needs legal advice.  Like when a drinking buddy of a friend tells me about his video poker dispute with the local bar.  He won more than $500 playing on the machines but the bar wasn’t paying up and he was wondering if there was anything he could do.

The problem, at least in the great state of Wisconsin, is that those video poker (and slot) machines are illegal in bars.  See WI Stat. Sec. 945.035.  But it’s a weird kind of illegal: if bars have five or less machines it’s only a misdemeanor and apparently there’s no prosecution for that misdemeanor.  If a bar has more than five machines, it’s a felony and it can be prosecuted (if it’s done the right way, with the right officials).

PoliceBadgeThat means a lot of Wisconsin bars have these machines even though they’re technically illegal.  And that’s bad news for everyone involved.  If somebody uses the machines to scam the bars, the bars don’t have much of a legal remedy.  That’s also true if somebody plays the machines and “wins” but the bar refuses to pay up.  Prosecutors and the police aren’t going to spend a lot of time helping people, or businesses, who got screwed over.

Sometimes the cops will help, but there isn’t a lot prosecutors can or will do to help people and businesses who are doing something illegal.  Just ask Boy George – sometimes you can end up in trouble when you call for help if you’re doing something illegal!  And sometimes the cops will seize a bar’s machines as contraband because they’re illegal machines, even if the bars never intended to pay out on their customers’ wins anyway (that’s karma!).  See In re Return of Prop., 2002 WI App 79, 252 Wis. 2d 604, 611 (holding that the police did not need to return video slot machines because they were illegal, even though the bar never paid out any money).

So if you’re in a bar and looking for a way to pass the time, go ahead and play on those machines but don’t expect to win anything.  It’s just another way to spend some money and pass the time while you check out that cutie across the bar!