Home Blog Page 76

Can HYDRA’s Cybertek Employees Argue They Acted Under Duress?

0

HYDRA Head John Garrett in the Agents of SHIELD season finale showed he truly had an organization with many heads. Cybertek, located in New Mexico, had employees who were acting as the handles for the soldiers with the explosive eye implants. These Cybertek employees provided instructions over a computer connect to the soldiers’ bionic eyes. In the event of non-compliance, the Cybertek employee could detonate the explosive eye-ball in a soldier.

HYDRA_Duress_1995The Cybertek employees were a mix of “volunteers” (HYDRA) and those who joined for the “Incentive Program.” This program was code for kidnapping a loved one and threatening harm for non-compliance with a HYDRA order.

Could the Cybertek employees argue they were operating under duress or the necessity defense? Could the soldiers in the field? What if the soldier killed someone or a Cybertek employee killed a soldier with his explosive eye?

Both Cybertek employees and the soldiers could argue they were only do they actions under duress. And this could work, unless someone was killed by the direct actions of the defendant.

Duress is the threat of harm made to compel a person to do something against his will. See, Black’s Law Dictionary App, 9th Edition. However, duress is a “defense as to all crimes except taking the life of an innocent person. . . .” McMillan v. State, 428 Md. 333, 351 (Md. 2012).

No one at Cybertek who detonated a soldier’s explosive eye could argue the duress defense, because a defendant cannot kill someone and argue they murdered under duress. State v. Nieto, 129 N.M. 688, 694 (N.M. 2000). The same could be said for soldiers in the field who are killing innocents upon threat of their eye exploding.

Cybertek employees MIGHT have a successful duress argue if they soldier they were providing instructions to, killed someone. In a case where a defendant was forced to participate in a robbery, and then those who caused the duress killed someone without the defendant’s involvement, the defendant could argue duress in those circumstances. McMillan v. State, 428 Md. 333, 351 (Md. 2012). Similarly, a Cybertek employee could argue that they were forced to provide assistance to HYDRA under duress and since they did not pull the trigger, they were not directly involved in murder. While there is no excuse for killing innocents to save one’s own life, there is a chance they could argue duress in those limited circumstances. Also a high chance it will fail.

The soldier on the other hand who killed people would have no duress defense.

Trip Can Bring the Funk, We’ll Bring the Law

0

Agents of SHIELD had a great season finale. Issues first presented in the pilot were tied up with a rewarding amount of action.

Excellent_Season2_1957But what about the legal issues? Could the Agents just get a free pass and pardons for being vigilantes? Could Agent Coulson torture Ward [Agent of HYDRA]? Could former Director Nick Fury make Agent Coulson the new Director of SHIELD? Plus, on whose authority were they arresting people?

Jessica Mederson and Josh Gilliland explore these issue and much more in the Agents of SHIELD Season Finale Podcast.

Gerry O’Brien on Agents of SHIELD & Agent Carter

0

SHIELD_HYDRA_Hearings_8673New York Political Consultant Gerry O’Brien, author of the steampunk novel 1901, is a long time Nick Fury and SHIELD fan. Gerry and Josh sat down to discuss the Agents of SHIELD episode “Ragtag,” covering the political and legal issues that have developed since Captain America Winter Soldier. Both are thrilled to have an Agent Carter series and shared their hopes about the new show.

The Following Constitutional Issues Take Place Between 1106am to 1200pm

0

24LogoJack is Back! The action on 24 is awesome. And right out of the gate, we have large Constitutional issues.

President James Heller is showing memory problems. Whether he has the early stages of Alzheimer or some dementia, this calls in his ability to serve as President. A lot would depend on whether it impairs him from carrying out his duties.

President Heller’s disease could trigger whether he has an “Inability to Discharge the Powers and Duties” of the President, creating issues under Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution and the 25 Amendment.

Presidents have to remember little things like nuclear launch codes, let alone the names of Congressmen, foreign leaders and talking points. If Heller is having medical problems more serious than mixing up Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt in sending the Great White Fleet around the world, there could be a real inability to serve. However, if his condition is keeping him off Jeopardy, probably not.

The story includes references to Heller running for President “four years ago.” This would put him well into his first term. The development of the disease at a minimum would keep him from running for a second term. Whether or not he could finish his first term would depend on the nature of the disease.

Should President Heller resign? Not yet from the first two hours, but the answer depends on his health. However, the knowledge of his disease could trigger the Vice President taking over as President under the 25th Amendment and Presidential Succession Act.

Now, about that Chief of Staff/Son-in-Law issuing orders from the President, there is nothing in the Constitution giving him the authority to do so….

Ragtag Legal Lessons from Agents of SHIELD

0

Agents of SHIELD is drawing to an excellent season finale. Here are legal issues from Ragtag.

Doing the Right Thing vs Vigilantes

Agent Fitz admitted the operations the Agents are carrying out makes them vigilantes. Agent Coulson countered he called it “doing the right thing.” The “doing the right thing” has been the core of the posts Vigilantes of SHIELD and Flying Lola in the Face of Orders. More importantly, Coulson’s motivation to “be the shield” has been an excellent moral justification for being of SHIELD.

Agent Coulson and his team are breaking the law, but they have a very strong “necessity defense,” because they are trying to stop greater crimes from happening. Moreover, there is no other course of action for them to take. Additionally, they have broken multiple laws in conducting law enforcement activities, but they have not taken the lives of anyone in law enforcement, the military or civilians. That still shows they are acting in the nation’s best interests and not outright committing treason.

Who is Cybertek’s Records Information Management Officer?

Cybertek would throw the Silicon Valley world of electronically stored information on its head by only maintaining paper records and not having any electronic data.

HYDRA_InfoGov_Email_9483For all of the attorneys who wish to avoid text messages, social media and email in litigation, Cybertek is the right client for you.

Just be highly skilled at defending charges ranging from treason to unlawful human medical experimentation.

There are over 14,000 records retention laws in the United States. Knowing which ones apply to a company is how general counsel earn their paychecks. Companies struggle with data managements, archiving, and preserving data they are legally required to maintain under the law or for business reasons.

That being said, Cybertek is not an anomaly for having paper documents going back to 1990. There are technology companies in Silicon Valley that have paper documents from the 1980s appearing in patent cases. That is not abnormal. What is highly strange would be a tech company in Palo Alto without computers.

Can We Get Haircuts in Cuba?

Cuba has the distinction of making Theodore Roosevelt a hero, a rare Presidential trip and speech by Calvin Coolidge, the Bay of Pigs, and being ground zero for almost starting World War III in 1962. For many foreign policy reasons, Cuba has been embargoed in a grudge match with the United States.

It would be very difficult for our heroes from SHIELD to drop in on Cuba for a day trip, without the risk of war. Moreover, a secret HYDRA base under a barber shop would not help Cuba’s relations with the United States.

Travel to Cuba is highly regulated for specific reasons. Tourist travel is prohibited. 31 CFR 515.560(F). General and specific travel licenses can be granted to those subject to US jurisdiction to Cuba for the following activities:

(1)  Family visits (general and specific licenses) (See § 515.561);
(2)  Official business of the U.S. government, foreign governments, and certain intergovernmental organizations (general license) (see § 515.562);
(3)  Journalistic activity (general and specific licenses) (see § 515.563);
(4)  Professional research and professional meetings (general and specific licenses) (See § 515.564);
(5)  Educational activities (general and specific licenses) (See § 515.565);
(6)  Religious activities (general and specific licenses) (See § 515.566);
(7)  Public performances, clinics, workshops, athletic and other competitions, and exhibitions (specific licenses) (See § 515.567);
(8)  Support for the Cuban people (specific licenses) (see § 515.574);
(9)  Humanitarian projects (specific licenses) (see § 515.575);

31 CFR 515.560.

SHIELD_CubaAgent Coulson and his team’s travel to Cuba would violate US law, as they could not apply for a license, and also Cuba’s rights as a nation. Most countries do not approve of rogue former spies doing the “right thing” in a paramilitary operation.

It also should be noted, getting a haircut and shave is not on the list.

In the unlikely event Agent Coulson and his fellow agents coordinated with the Cuban government, they would likely violate the Logan Act. This law prohibits US citizens effectively having their own foreign policy agreements with the “intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government” that are “in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States.” 18 USCS § 953. Given the nature of the relations with Cuba, and the likely negative reaction from the US with HYDRA launching operations from Cuba into the United States, the Logan Act might be violated if Coulson coordinated with Cuba. However, this seems highly unlikely.

Don’t Make Me Go Old Yeller

Garrett should not be allowed around children. Or Dogs.

There is no question that John Garrett “liberating” Grant Ward from juvenile hall would have been child abduction.  Massachusetts law states:

Whoever, without lawful authority, forcibly or secretly confines or imprisons a child under the age of 16 within the commonwealth against his will or forcibly carries or sends such person out of the commonwealth or forcibly seizes and confines or inveigles or kidnaps a child under the age of 16 with the intent either to cause him to be secretly confined or imprisoned in the commonwealth against his will or to cause him to be sent out of the commonwealth against his will or in any way held to service against his will, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 15 years. The provisions of the preceding sentence shall not apply to the parent of a child under 16 years of age who takes custody of such child.

ALM GL ch. 265, § 26.

Garrett arguably meets this offense, because HYDRA agents forcibly broke Ward out of juvenile hall and left Ward in the woods to fend for himself. While Ward did agree to go with Garrett, that did not also include “troops are about attack.” Moreover, leaving a minor in the woods to care for themselves would be child abuse and abandonment.

HYDRA_OldYellerOrdering Ward to kill Buddy the Dog would violate Wyoming law, which defines animal abuse, in part, as “unnecessarily… attempts to kill an animal.” Wyo. Stat. § 6-3-203(a)(ii).

Forcing Ward to kill Buddy would go far beyond Old Yeller, where our boy hero had to shoot his beloved dog infected with rabies.

Buddy’s only reason to be put down was making Ward weak by emotional attachment. If the young Ward had executed Buddy, he would have committed a crime.

And Garrett is a supreme jerk.

Too bad Ward did not feel the same loyalty to all the SHIELD Agents he killed.

It is eerie that it looked like Ward was going to kill Fitz and Simmons like Old Yeller. Instead of being in a shed, Fitz and Simmons were in a cargo pod as Ward wrestled with his feelings. However, Fitz’s puppy dog loyalty to Ward seems to have been rewarded by being dumped at sea from a survivable altitude and speed, opposed to executed like Old Yeller in a shed.

An EMP As a Weapon

Fitz might not understand how to do a fist bump, but he knew how to ruin a cyborg’s day with an electromagnetic pulse.

Was using the EMP a valid form of self-defense? Maybe. Garrett wanted Fitz and Simmons dead. While a gun was not to his head, stopping Garrett was more a tactical move to eliminate an enemy.

Vader’s Forcing Confessions

0

Darth Vader had a very forceful way of getting the information he wanted from people. From the opening scenes of Episode IV, we learned Vader thrived on choking others. Moreover, orders such as, “Commander, tear this ship apart until you’ve found those plans, and bring me the passengers. I want them alive!” do not endear him as someone who is not above using any means to get the answers he wants.

Vader_RevoltingJustice_0213Episode IV included a scene where Princess Leia faced a floating droid that appeared ready inject her with a truth serum.

Would that be legal under our laws?

I Have A Bad Feeling About This

The Empire and its Doctrine of Fear is not one that would protect civil rights. Its very founding was based on “security” to protect its “citizens,” not one of freedom.

Could a Republic, be it the United States or the Old Republic, force confessions from prisoners with truth serum?

The Fifth Amendment gives everyone the right in the United States to NOT “be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” Moreover, the long line of cases following Miranda go to advise people of their right to remain silent, and the right to counsel, if they have been arrested.

StarWars_Forcing_Confessions_2126One of the most extreme cases involving forced confessions was from 1936, where the Supreme Court referred to an extracted confession through brutal torture as “revolting to the sense of justice.” Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278, 286 (1936).

Truth serums administered to prisoners uniformly have been found to violate the law. Courts often refer to such compelled confessions as “police wrongdoing.” Colo. v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 165 (U.S. 1986), citing Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 298-299 (U.S. 1963).

Montana Supreme Court Justice Harrison held in State v. Allies that confessions made under the influence of a “truth serum” was not voluntary. State v. Allies, 186 Mont. 99, 115 (Mont. 1979). As the Court explained:

The pivotal issue presented here is whether the results of the sodium amytal (popularly known as truth serum) test are admissible where the recipient was without benefit or advice of counsel and had not received a Miranda warning immediately preceding the administration of the serum. We find they are not. The overwhelming weight of authority in this country still regards truth serum tests as inadmissible inasmuch as they have not attained the scientific acceptance as reliable and accurate means of ascertaining truth or deception.

Allies, at *114.

nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, – See more at: http://constitution.laws.com/5th-amendment#sthash.cQfK9nLu.dpuf
or shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, – See more at: http://constitution.laws.com/5th-amendment#sthash.cQfK9nLu.dpuf

Many Courts will not allow any truth serum results or expert testimony over truth serum results from expert witnesses, until it is proven with “verifiable certainty that truth serum compels a person to tell the truth.” Harper v. State, 249 Ga. 519, 526 (Ga. 1982).

What does this mean for Darth Vader and Governor Tarkin ordering Leia to be injected with a truth serum? First, Vader is not getting a Father’s Day card. Second, it would not be legal in a country like the United States, which highlights the dangers of a society founded on security instead of freedom. Third, the truth serum was not effective, as Leia did not provide the location of the Rebel Base or Plans.

Did the Clone Troopers Have to follow General Krell’s Orders?

0

Jessica Mederson and Joshua Gilliland sought out Judge Matthew Sciarrino for his extensive Star Wars knowledge to discuss the casting news of Episode VII: The Order of the Jedi, and the legal issues surrounding General Krell vs the 501st in the Clone Wars.

Plus, what to do when your video conference software does not switch to active speaker.