Home Blog Page 19

The Galaxy’s Greatest Son: Kylo Ren’s Inheritance

0

The Rise of Skywalker nearly is upon us and Star Wars fans worldwide are clamoring for answers to the questions that have plagued us since The Last Jedi. While things like the fate of the Resistance and Palpatine’s mysterious return are no doubt important to many, there is one question that stands above all others: What will Kylo Ren’s inheritance be?

With the love of estate planning being so prevalent amongst Star Wars fans, it’s time to give the people what they really want by taking a look at what the galaxy’s #1 son stands to inherit as the Skywalker Saga concludes.

What parent wouldn’t want to leave their things to such a doting and well-adjusted son like Kylo?

Kylo first found himself in a position to possibly receive inheritance at the start of the sequel trilogy. Kylo’s life was suddenly turned upside down towards the end of The Force Awakens when his father, Han Solo, suddenly died of a tragic lightsaber wound.

When someone dies (even on a far away planet that is also a superweapon), a legal process known as probate is used to settle the decedent’s (dead person’s) debts and to ensure their property is transferred to heirs and beneficiaries in an orderly fashion. A specialized type of court, known as a probate court, is typically involved in this process, with the goal of overseeing the administration of estates.

Even though Han wasn’t exactly in the best financial position at the time of his death, he still had assets to his name. From the reclaimed Millennium Falcon to his trusty DL-44 blaster, Han owned a decent amount of property at death, which would need to be distributed during the probate process.

The law generally requires that you outlive someone in order to inherit from his or her estate. Leia and Kylo, as Han’s surviving spouse and child, would therefore both be in position to be beneficiaries of Han’s estate.

“This is NOT how I thought this day was gonna end.”

The first step in the probate process is determining whether Han died with a will. A will is a key part of the probate process, since it’s the document in which a person expresses how his property should be distributed after he dies. As someone who lives out of his spaceship and illegally hauls rathtars around the galaxy, it’s safe to say that Han probably never took the time to sit down a and draft a will.

When someone dies without a will, a set of default laws kick in. Known as intestate succession laws, these laws apply equally to anyone who dies without a will. In the absence of a will to provide clear directions, intestate laws operate to ensure an orderly distribution of an estate that minimizes fighting amongst heirs. These laws establish both who is eligible to inherit from an estate, as well as setting their respective shares.

For example, in Pennsylvania, in the case of a person who is survived by both a spouse and a child of that marriage, the spouse inherits the first $30,000 of the decedent’s property, plus half of the remaining balance, and the child inherits the rest. Han’s family fits that profile, meaning Leia and Kylo would potentially stand to inherit a decent chunk of Han’s estate.

Kylo can’t wait to hang his dad’s lucky sabaac dice over the rearview mirror of his command shuttle.

But before Kylo can tear off in the Millennium Falcon to do space donuts, he’ll have to deal with a major legal speed bump to his inheritance claim. That legal hiccup arises because of how Han died. Kylo isn’t in a position to inherit from his dad because of some unfortunate accident or a sudden deadly illness—he murdered his father in cold blood. If it seems patently unfair that someone might stand to inherit from his own misdeeds, that’s because it absolutely is.

Fortunately, just about every state has legal mechanisms in place to prevent these types of ill-gotten gains. Commonly known as “slayer statutes,” these laws prevent someone who killed the decedent from inheriting from the victim’s estate. Slayer statutes accomplish this by treating the slayer as having died before or “predeceased” the victim, which effectively bars them from inheriting any property. One of the most famous examples of a slayer statute in action came with the Menendez Brothers in the 1990s. Lyle and Erik Menendez, heirs to a $14.5 million dollar estate, brutally murdered their parents in 1989. They were later convicted in a high profile trial and barred from inheriting the lucrative estate.

In Kylo’s case, he would almost certainly be classified as a “slayer” under the law in most states. In Pennsylvania, a slayer is defined as “any person who participates, either as a principal or as an accessory before the fact, in the willful and unlawful killing of another person.” Kylo was a principal in the death of Han, having willfully run him through with a lightsaber on Starkiller base.

Obliterating property of the estate just because you can’t inherit it is never the right answer.

Although Kylo might cry foul that he hasn’t been tried and convicted of Han’s death, that wouldn’t matter in most states. While a criminal conviction for murder is often treated as conclusive proof that someone is a slayer, a typical slayer statute does not require a criminal conviction. That’s because these statutes are civil laws, not criminal laws, which means the burden of proof is much lower. Kylo’s responsibility for Han’s killing would therefore only need to be shown by a preponderance of the evidence, as opposed to being proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if the court concluded that it was more likely than not that Kylo killed Han, he would be blocked from any inheritance. Given that there were two eyewitnesses to the crime (three if the court can find a wookiee interpreter for Chewbacca to testify), that burden of proof would be easy to meet.

Kylo might also argue that he isn’t a slayer because he wasn’t criminally responsible for Han’s murder, perhaps by reason of Dark Side induced insanity. But despite that argument, he might still be barred from any inheritance in certain states. For example, in Florida, the definition of a slayer is much broader, including those who unlawfully kills or merely participates in procuring the death of someone. That expansive definition includes crimes that go beyond premeditated murder, and arguably includes lesser unlawful killings such as involuntary manslaughter.

Unfortunately for Kylo, his eagerness to prove himself to Snoke likely doomed his chances at any inheritance. Kylo won’t even stand to inherit a single one of Han’s dusty old vests (which are no doubt covered in Chewbacca hair).

San Diego Comic Fest 2020 Call for Law Students for Mandalorian Adoption Hearing Mock Trial

0

Interested law students can apply to serve as counsel in our fifth mock trial at San Diego Comic Fest, to be held on March 7, 2020, at the Four Points by Sheraton in San Diego.

This year’s Comic Fest will celebrate the centennials of Ray Bradbury and Ray Harryhausen with guests including Bill Sienkiewicz, J. Michael Straczynski, Marv Wolfman, and many more.

This year’s mock trial will be the Adoption Petition for The Child by The Mandalorian. Interested law students can apply below. Attorney coaches will work with the law students and witnesses on their respective cases. The teams will represent the Petitioner Mandalorian for his Adoption Petition for The Child and the Respondent Background Check Agency who conducted the Home Study. The Bench Brief will be available after the conclusion of The Mandalorian Season 1.

Lessons with Contract and Partnerships on The Mandalorian

0

The Sorgan Krill Farmers contracted with The Mandalorian in a contract for services that was straight out of Magnum PI: The Mandalorian would provide security services against raiders in exchange for lodging. While the Mandalorian and the Child were not in the guesthouse at Robin’s Nest, they did get a nice barn for their lodging with food services. Was that a valid contract?

Taking inspiration from Hawaiian law, a “landlord and tenant may agree to any consideration, not otherwise prohibited by law, as rent.” HRS § 521-21. In this case, the consideration is performance of security services. As there was not a written rental agreement between the parties as to the tenancy of a lease, the tenancy is a month-to-month lease. HRS § 521-22. However, as there was no written contract, the lease could be unenforceable under the statute of frauds. HRS § 490:2A-201. However, since there was contract performance by the Mandalorian and Cara Dune, this arguably would eliminate the statute of frauds issue. See, Shannon v. Waterhouse, 58 Hawai’i 4, 5-6, 563 P.2d 391, 393 (1977).

The contract for security services in exchange for lodging was likely valid, but does have an issue with the lease agreement not being in writing.

Was there a Partnership Agreement between Mandalorian and Cara Dune? 

The Mandalorian immediately sought the assistance of Care Dune to assist in providing security services to the Sorgan Krill Farmers. Did this alliance form a partnership between the Mandalorian and Dune?

A partnership is “the association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners of a business for profit forms a partnership, whether or not the persons intend to form a partnership. . . .” Hirschfeld v. Hirschfeld, 50 Conn. App. 280, 287 (Conn. App. Ct. 1998), citing Conn. General Statutes § 34-314.

The Mandalorian and Care Dune provided security services together for the Sorgan Krill Farmers, in exchange for lodging. Moreover, Dune was paid “lunch money” as her initial consideration to join the partnership. While neither truly followed the formal requirements to form of partnership, their conduct did show two individuals working together for profit. This is the classic definition of a partnership, or at least a joint venture.

Did the Sorgan Farmers fail to disclose a material fact about the AT-ST? 

Not all surprises are good. The Sorgan Krill Farmers failing to tell the Mandalorian and Cara Dune about the Raiders’ Imperial Walker would fall into the “not good” surprise category. The issue for their security contract is whether the non-disclosure of that material fact could make the contract voidable. There are situations when a contracting party has a duty to speak about a material fact that can amount to concealment.

There can be a duty to speak about a material fact under four situations:

It may be directly imposed by statute or other prescriptive law;

It may be voluntarily assumed by contractual undertaking;

It may arise as an incident of a relationship between the defendant and the plaintiff; and

It may arise as a result of other conduct by the defendant that makes it wrongful for him to remain silent.

CACI No. 1901 citing SCC Acquisitions, Inc. v. Central Pacific Bank 207 Cal.App.4th 859, 860 (2012).

The tort elements for concealment are:

1) The defendant must have concealed or suppressed a material fact;

2) The defendant must have been under a duty to disclose the fact to the plaintiff;

3) The defendant must have intentionally concealed or suppressed the fact with the intent to defraud the plaintiff;

4) The plaintiff must have been unaware of the fact and would not have acted as he did if he had known of the concealed or suppressed fact, and

5) As a result of the concealment or suppression of the fact, the plaintiff must have sustained damage.

Boschma v. Home Loan Center, Inc. 198 Cal.App.4th 230, 248 (2011)

The Sorgan Krill Farmers would have had a duty to disclose their knowledge of the AT-ST, because the fact there was an Imperial Walker would have been voluntarily assumed by the contractual undertaking; that it would have arose as an incident of a relationship between the defendant and the plaintiff; and it was just wrong for them to remain silent about the Walker. That was a material fact that went to the performance of the contract and should have been disclosed. However, it is unlikely the Farmers intended to defraud the Mandalorian and simply were clueless to the importance of disclosing the fact the fact there was an AT-ST. This did require an immediate contract modification to teach the Farmers how to defend themselves, opposed to voiding the contract.

Back to Tatooine with The Mandalorian

0

Does leaving Stormtrooper heads on pikes violate public health laws against desecration of a corpse? Can you leave a child in a spaceship without adult supervision? Joshua Gilliland, Gabby Martin, and Thomas Harper explore these issues and more in The Mandalorian episode The Gunslinger.

How the Mandalorian Saved the Blue Harvest

0

Legal review of The Mandalorian episode “Sanctuary” with Joshua Gilliland, Gabby Martin, and Thomas Harper.

 

Leashing the Loth-cat

0

In the meme-rich Episode 4 of The Mandalorian, a cranky Loth-cat menaces Baby Yoda while the protagonists are trying to blend in with the locals on the planet of Sorgan. This alarming little confrontation raises some legal questions about bringing a pet along when visiting the friendly neighborhood public house.

Animals in a food facility

First off, the Loth-cat’s presence in the public house’s dining area is of concern. Generally, state and local regulations of food safety forbid animals in restaurants. See, e.g., Cal. Health & Safety Code § 114259.5(a); N.Y.C., N.Y., Health Code § 81.25.

Despite this general rule, a number of states, including Florida, New York, Illinois, and California, have in recent years passed statutes that allow restaurants to serve patrons with dogs in outdoor seating areas. But the restaurant seating in The Mandalorian seems like it’s inside a structure, albeit a relatively open-air one. In any event, those laws are dog-specific, so an intergalactic cat could not benefit from these al fresco exceptions.

Notably, the Americans with Disabilities Act requires public accommodations like restaurants to allow patrons with disabilities to dine with their qualified service animal. 42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(2)(A)(ii); 28 C.F.R. § 36.302(c). However, the ADA regulations define a service animal as a dog (or a miniature horse) and exclude all other creatures, including those of a feline variety. 28 C.F.R. § 36.104 (definition of “Service Animal”). An ill-tempered Loth-cat certainly would not qualify as a trained service animal that is entitled by the ADA to be in a restaurant.

Leash requirements for animals in public

But even assuming that the Loth-cat’s presence in a restaurant was not unlawful, the Loth-cat is apparently unrestrained and untethered. Is the owner of this grouchy Loth-cat required to keep it on a leash?

As an initial observation, leash laws tend to focus only on dogs. Two states, Michigan and Pennsylvania, require that owners maintain control of dogs while outside the home. Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 287.262 (making it unlawful for owner to allow a dog “to stray unless held properly in leash”); 3 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 459-305 (requiring that dogs be “under the reasonable control of some person”). Beyond that, states broadly regulate dogs that roam “at large” and allow the authorities to capture stray canines. Otherwise, dog leash laws are creatures of local regulation. See, e.g., N.Y.C., N.Y., Health Code § 161.05(a); Chi., Ill., Municipal Code § 7-12-030. 

Also, many states and cities impose leashing, muzzling, and other requirements on dogs that have been adjudicated as dangerous or vicious. While the Loth-cat certainly snapped and growled at the Child, it’s not clear that the Loth-cat qualifies as a dangerous animal, and again: not a dog. 

When it comes to our feline friends, some municipalities require cats to be on leashes when outside the home. See, e.g., Dallas, Tex., Code of Ordinances § 7-3.1(a)(4); Englewood, Colo., Municipal Code § 7-1A-3; St. Louis, Mo., Ordinances § 10.04.225; S.F., Cal., Park Code § 5.03 (requiring cats to be leashed or crated only while in San Francisco city parks). But given the difficulty of catching unleashed cats, cat leash laws can be controversial and their efficacy questionable. And given that The Mandalorian takes place in the lawless times after the Empire has collapsed, it seems unlikely that the rural world of Sorgan regards cat leashing as a legislative priority.

Of course, even if there were no leash requirements for Loth-cats on Sorgan, the owner would have been liable for negligence if—God forbid—the Loth-cat had injured Baby Yoda. Thankfully, Baby Yoda seemed unscathed, but Loth-cats turn up all over the galaxy far, far away with nary a leash, crate, or registration tag in sight. After Baby Yoda’s brush with the surly Loth-cat in Episode 4, perhaps he will use his celebrity platform to persuade his local representatives to finally enact some much-needed Loth-cat regulations.

This is the Way: Refugees with Jetpacks

0
Don’t say the Guild didn’t warn you…

At first glance, Mandalorians might not seem like a desperate lot, what with all their blasters, flamethrowers, whistling birds, heavy repeating cannons, jet packs, and…well you get the idea. But behind those steely beskar helmets are a people fighting for their very existence in the galaxy far far away. The first few episodes of The Mandalorian have given us a very different look at Mandalorians.

A far cry from what we’ve previously seen of their society in The Clone Wars or Rebels series, Mandalorians have been driven into the shadows by the Empire, forced to hide like sand rats. But with the fall of the Empire, could the Mandalorian people lawfully claim refugee status in order to get protection from the New Republic?

Let’s all agree that Baby Yoda would be granted INSTANT asylum in every single household in the Star Wars galaxy.

Unfortunately for Mandalorians, escaping persecution in the galaxy probably isn’t as easy as planting a sweet Mythosaur flag on a new planet. Even though The Mandalorian takes place several years after Return of the Jedi, it’s clear that the entire galaxy hasn’t suddenly become a friendly place after the Empire’s fall, especially for certain groups like the Mandalorians.

From mopping up Imperial warlords to establishing a credible new government, the New Republic undoubtedly had a large set of priorities competing for its limited resources.   However, given the huge numbers of people displaced by the galactic civil war, the work of crafting a legal framework to govern refugees and asylum seekers would likely have been a top priority for leaders like Mon Mothma.

The basic judicial legal concept of asylum dates back millennia. It allows those persecuted by or within their own country to seek sanctuary and protection from another sovereign authority. Over time, countries have developed their own unique refugee and asylum laws, which means legal standards differ depending on which country you’re seeking refugee status in. For example, under Australian law, those who attempt to travel illegally by boat to the country will not be processed or resettled in Australia. Intended as a measure to stop human smuggling, those arriving illegally by boat may be returned to international borders or sent to a third country for processing. Elsewhere, in Brazil the granting of asylum is a principle enshrined in the country’s constitution.

We don’t know precisely what galactic laws are on the books at the time of The Mandalorian (Lucasfilm ought to give us the Star Wars legal drama we deserve), so we will have to fill the gap with real world law. To that end, we will use U.S. refugee and asylum law as a guide.

By the end of the massive gunfight at the end of Episode 3 (The Sin), the Mandalorians had probably blown their welcome on that particular planet to smithereens. The Mandalorian seemingly confirms this, telling his hulking brother in arms that the Tribe would be forced to relocate to another planet. Since they would be seeking sanctuary on another planet from outside its borders, the Tribe would therefore be considered refugees, assuming they meet that legal definition.

Destroying literally everything in sight isn’t the ideal way to endear yourself to local officials.

Before the Mandalorians can go plop down their jet packs on a new planet, they would bear the burden of proving they are entitled to refugee status. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), a refugee is defined as any person outside their own country who is unable or unwilling to return there because they have suffered past persecution or has a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.

The Tribe has clearly been displaced from their home on Mandalore, having resorted to hiding out on a dingy backwater planet. Historically, Mandalorians were a very territorial people who fiercely defended their independence from the larger galaxy. Given Mandalorians’ deep connection to their home, it’s incredibly unlikely Mandalorians would voluntarily choose to live off world en masse. The Mandalorian’s conversation with fellow Tribe members back this up, making it clear that they were driven into hiding by the Empire.

We know from the Rebels series that Mandalorians still occupied their planet in some form within a year of the Death Star’s destruction in A New Hope. The Tribe speaks of a major event occurring some time after that point which was seemingly the catalyst that drove Mandalorians from their home. While we don’t yet know a great deal about this event, it is referred to as the Great Purge. That apparent atrocity ultimately scattered surviving Mandalorians and sent them into into hiding. This means the Tribe could certainly prove that it suffered past persecution that displaced them from Mandalore.

Since the Great Purge was inflicted upon the Mandalorian people, they also have a strong case that the persecution was on account of their nationality or religion. Nationality is traditionally based on one’s citizenship. As citizens of the sovereign planet Mandalore, ‘Mandalorian’ could be considered a nationality in the same way we recognize a legal difference between U.S. and French or Italian citizens.

However nationality isn’t defined only by one’s citizenship. Persecution of ethnic, linguistic, and cultural groups within a population can also be deemed persecution based on nationality. The persecution of ethnic minorities within their own borders is often considered persecution based on nationality. The Chin people of Myanmar are a good example of this principle.  While the Chin are technically citizens of Myanmar, the targeted persecution of their group has been considered persecution based on nationality. Much like the Chin, Mandalorians would likely constitute their own ethnic subgroup of the larger galaxy, given their unique common culture that includes a religious devotion to weapons and fervent dedication to not removing their helmets. The Empire’s targeted mass murder of Mandalorians would therefore qualify as persecution based on nationality.

Who says a refugee can’t have a heavy repeater blaster and jetpack?

But it is not enough to have simply been persecuted in the past. Proving that they are unable or unwilling to return to Mandalore on account of that persecution is a much tougher legal hurdle for the Tribe. By the time of the show the Empire and its military had long since been dismantled, which means the major threat to their existence had arguably been neutralized.

In response, the Tribe would argue that the Imperial military hasn’t been fully swept away, particularly in the far reaches of the galaxy. We’ve seen evidence of this so far in the show, with The Client commanding a number of Imperial troops. Mandalore similarly lies in the Outer Rim, far from the reach of New Republic authorities, which makes it plausible that a dangerous Imperial remnant still operates there. Simply alleging that Imperials are likely still operating around Mandalore would not be enough to meet their legal burden. It would be incumbent upon the Tribe to offer tangible evidence of the threat posed by Imperial remnant forces.

With the New Republic now governing the galaxy, Mandalorians would also need to prove that the government was unwilling or unable to protect their people. Under the INA, an applicant must show more than the government’s mere difficulty in controlling private behavior, such as that of Imperial remnant forces. Similarly, the mere fact that a country has problems effectively policing certain crimes is not enough to qualify one as a refugee. Considering the devastation Mandalore endured at the Empire’s hand, the Tribe might present evidence that Mandalore’s government remains in tatters following the galactic civil war, with no organized law enforcement or military force in place to protect its citizens.  Presenting the planet as a lawless place with a completely defunct government would make for a powerful argument in favor of refugee status. The Tribe could present a similar argument about the New Republic, who clearly lack the resources to do much outside the Core.

With so many unanswered questions about Mandalore, the Tribe’s legal fate rests on their ability to fill in those gaps in evidence. My personal legal advice would be to forgo the time consuming refugee process and instead mount the sort of massive Mandalorian assault to retake the planet that we’re all dying to see.