Firefly was wickedly creative, well-written and had fantastic humor. Spaceships and wardrobe that ranged from Western to Steampunk to Chinese aside, Firefly presented excellent Contract formation issues.
Contract formation consists of 1) Offer; 2) Acceptance; 3) Consideration; and 4) Performance.
In the world of Firefly, it was often 1) Offer 2) Acceptance 3) Gunfight (also known as breach). Let’s review three episodes to examine these contract issues.
Shindig
Consideration in Contract Law involves something of “value” being given up by a promissor to a promisee in exchange for something of value given by a promisee to a promissor (Nice summary in Wikipedia). In Shindig, the consideration for earning Warrick Harrow’s cattle shipment job was surviving a sword fight with one of Inara’s clients (it also could be a condition precedent, because Mal did have to survive the fight).
Since the old idea that consideration can be a peppercorn, a sword fight does not seem too crazy in a future with space cowboys fighting an oppressive regime.
The Train Job
The Train Job was the second episode in the series. Malcolm Reynolds formed an oral contract with a crime boss named Adelei Niska to steal medical supplies from a train. Niska made a payment for the work to be performed, which involves extracting cargo from a fast-moving train with Alliance soldiers onboard.
The heist was a success, with the exception the Captain and Zoe were stuck on the train and ultimately needed to be “rescued” by Inara after being detained in town.
However, once Mal and Zoe reached the destination of the cargo, they learned the medicine was vital for the survival of a mining town where everyone was suffering from the effects of mining.
Mal’s following actions are best described as contract rescission, which is the unwinding of an agreement. Mal decided to return the stolen medicine to the town and the money back to Niska. Granted, since this was an action show, there was a gunfight and someone sucked through a jet intake before Niska’s men accepted the rescission (non-traditional contract remedies were later sought by Niska in War Stories).
Out of Gas
The contract issues in Out of Gas focused on a salvage ship that found the crippled Serenity with only Mal onboard.
Serenity was heavily damaged from an engine room fire and needed a new compression coil.
The salvage captain boarded Serenity and shot Mal after seeing Mal was telling the truth about Serenity’s damage (this was after Mal offered anything of value in the ship’s hold).
The actions up until the shooting showed the parties went beyond offer and acceptance to performance, because the salvage captain boarded Serenity with the compression coil in hand.
Given the fact payment had not been determined, there was an uncertain term to the contract. However, there was sufficient evidence to show a contract had been formed based upon the conduct of the parties (boarding Serenity with the part Mal requested from the salvage captain).
After being shot, Mal armed himself with the gun from the “Mule” and ordered the captain and crew off his ship. While there was no payment made for the compression coil, the salvage captain breached his agreement when he shot Mal. Keeping the compression coil would have been the proper damage recovery (sure, there is a separate cause of action for shooting someone).
Curse Your Sudden But Inevitable Betrayal
The remedy for a breach of contract is either money damages or equitable remedies. Gunfights in the series aside, Out of Gas focused more on the equitable remedy of specific performance. In the instance of The Train Job, returning Niska’s money was designed to put him in the same place as he was before the contract with Malcolm Renyolds.
So let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job and then I get paid.
Captain Malcolm Reynolds
Firefly essentially was about engaging in contract work for payment. Each episode has different themes on issues of formation, breach or remedies. While the show was certainly not a transactional space adventure with cowboys, the contract issues are very prevalent.
I’m somewhat curious as to when contracts are formed without consent of one party. You get handed a piece of paper with “we agree to these terms.”, with your name and the name of the accompanying party.
[…] do you know that you love what you are doing? I read this article this morning and found it appealing to my geek-side, but then it struck me that this is a great […]
[…] this abundantly clear. I do the job and then I get paid.Captain Malcolm ReynoldsLink to the rest at The Legal GeeksClick to Tweet/Email/Share This Post wpa2a.script_load(); ContractsNo Comments to “Firefly […]
[…] Firefly & Lessons in Contract Law: Firefly was wickedly creative, well-written and had fantastic humor. Spaceships and wardrobe that […]
Good work!
Hey there, I can’t say I’ve ever looked at an episode of Firefly in quite this light, but I can’t fault your reasoning.
Very cool post.
A very shiny analysis, if I may say so. The concepts of bilateral performance were clearly stated in Mal’s quote from the pilot episode “Serenity”: He performs the job, and he gets paid by the client (in that case, Patience, who instead tried to shoot him.) The attempted shooting was a clear breach, thus entitling him to damages. In that particular case, he got the money he was owed, and she lost several of her best shooters. Harsh contractual terms for a harsh world, I guess.
You could also point to the episode “Heart of Gold” as an example of an in-kind service exchange, if you want to get really geeky.
I would be very “Unforgiven” if we addressed that issue.
[…] I never really considered until today was what it had to say about contract law. Thankfully, the Legal Geeks had the idea before I did (dangit) and offered their thoughts on the matter: Firefly was wickedly […]
[…] is a link from The Legal Geeks discussing everything you can learn about contract law from Joss Whedon’s Firefly. Maybe […]
Our Mrs. Reynolds would also raise issues of marriage contracts, and in Ariel, Simon exchanges payment for services rendered. And if you don’t mind, I’m going to this post in my blog.
[…] Read it. Firefly was wickedly creative, well-written and had fantastic humor. Spaceships and wardrobe that ranged from Western to Steampunk to Chinese aside, Firefly presented excellent Contract formation issues. […]
[…] Firefly and lessons in contract law. […]
Love the post, love the tee shirts more. I need them.
[…] LEGAL GEEKS: Firefly And Lessons In Contract Law. […]
[…] Posted on 30 September, 2012 by wjjhoge A guy in a brown coat explains the basic principles of the Law of Contracts (H/T, Instapundit). Share […]
Yea, Saffron did show us alot about contract law and breach of contract in ‘Garbage’. And I need one of those t-shirts to. Wish they would make a squeal to Serenity!
Would not the request for assistance (A compression coil for Serenity) properly fall under Admiralty Law, rather than Contract Law?
Good question. It may turn on whether there is a duty to rescue under Admiralty Law.
[…] Whedon’s Firefly, you MUST go read Firefly and Contrat Law on the Legal Geeks […]
[…] physics in science fiction — it's like an awesome sport that everybody wins. (Except physics.) Firefly & Lessons in Contract Law | The Legal Geeks […]
[…] a co-worker sent me an email with this link to The Legal Geeks blog, and the subject line: “law + firefly = fwd to [WB].” I happened to receive the […]
Firefly is the best!
Nice post! I didn’t catch all the episodes of Firefly but I very well remember ‘The Train Job’ episode. I quite liked the show for its peculiar humor and entertaining characters. And considering the fact that the show was aired a decade ago, the visual effects were simply amazing.
Humbly submitted: The posting completely missed the “third party interference” and “acceptable offer and subject matter” issues from the second Niska appearance/torture episode. Mr. Niska’s interference with the medical supplies exchange (as someone in the business) by killing the offeror and kidnapping the offeree was a decent look at third party contract interference and unfair competition claims. The “I’m going to sleep with your wife” discussion, which Walsh correctly negated with allegations of duress, could also have been nullified by arguing unlawful subject matter or lack of consideration (pun optional).
Thanks for posting the article!