Home Blog Page 70

Minority Report Repealed the 14th Amendment?

0

Here is a true legal dystopian future: the 14th Amendment was repealed to revoke US citizenship by birthright as a compromise in giving 10 million people not legally in the United States amnesty in the Minority Report episode “The American Dream.”

The text of the 14th Amendment, Section 1, states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The idea of repealing the 14th Amendment is terrifying. It is the Constitutional lynchpin enacted after the Civil War that underscores Equal Protection and Due Process rights applying to everyone in the United States. It is means to the majority of the Bill of Rights applying to the states. The legal world of Minority Reports sounds like a bloody nightmare, beyond arresting people for crimes that they have not yet committed.

Perhaps the repealed 14th Amendment was replaced was an Amendment that retained the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses, only replacing the naturalized citizen clause. That might lesson the damage, but it would still leave people born in the United States who did not have any rights from citizenship.

Minority Report does not feature lawyers discussing Constitutional law, but it is a good bet that State Constitutions would fill in any gaps created by repealing the 14th Amendment, which would then give more reliance on the Full Faith and Credit and Privileges and Immunities Clauses of Article IV of the US Constitution in protecting the rights of citizens.

Does Supergirl Need a Lawyer?

0

We both love the new Supergirl series. Check out our podcast on the legal issues of being a super-hero, plus the huge eDiscovery issues with heroes sending instant messages.

Seeking Law Students for the Mock Trial of the Winter Soldier

0

We are looking for six law students to join us for the Mock Trial of the Winter Soldier at San Diego Comic Fest, February 12-15, 2016. The Prosecution (The Avengers) and the Defense (The Defenders) will each be made up of three law students. Students may also serve as the bailiff, clerk (and time keeper), and court reporter.

The mock trial will focus on the insanity defense on whether James “Bucky” Barnes was unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of his acts in Captain America The Winter Soldier, due to a severe mental disease or defect.

United States Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal will preside over the mock trial. The expert witnesses are Dr. Andrea Letamendi, from The Arkham Sessions and Dr. Janina Scarlet, from Super-Hero Therapy.

If you are a current law student interested in participating, please review our program outline and contact us on the form below:


We are also seeking attorney coaches to help mentor the law students and witnesses. If interested, please contact us on the following form:

Mock Trial Overview

The Trial of the Winter Soldier is based on the film Captain America The Winter Soldier, with additional facts taken from The Winter Soldier storyline in Captain America to define other victims.

The trial will focus only on the Prosecution and Defense Opening Statements (3 minutes each), direct examination of the Defense and Prosecution Expert Witnesses (10 minutes, each, minus time for objections), cross-examination of the expert witnesses (5 minutes), and re-direct of the expert witnesses (2 minutes).

Objections, offers of proof, and the judge’s decision are excluded from the time. All Objections are based on the Federal Rules of Evidence and any relevant privileges under Federal or California law.

Each side will make a 5-minute closing argument as to the Defendant’s guilt, limited to facts established in the film, specifically referenced events from the comics, and the expert testimony as to whether James Buchanan Barnes understood the wrongfulness of his actions at the time he committed the charges. 

Case Overview

James Buchanan Barnes is charged with collaboration as a prisoner of war, multiple counts of murder, terrorism, insurrection, and treason. Barnes’ crimes span over 70 years of levying war against the United States with the terrorist organization HYDRA.

The Government will argue that James Barnes was a willful participant in Secretary Alexander Pierce’s plan to overthrow the United States government, which included the planned assassination President Mathew Ellis, all of Congress (minus Senator Stern), the United States Supreme Court, and several million United States citizens from Washington, DC, to New York City.

The Defense will argue that Defendant Barnes was legally insane at the time of the alleged criminal actions. Barnes is now competent to stand trial.

Both witnesses are qualified as experts pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 702. All testimony and expert reports must comply with Federal Rules of Evidence Rules 703, 704, and 705.

Goal of Defense Expert Witness

The Defense Expert witness must prove by clear and convincing evidence that at the commission of all charged crimes that James Buchanan Barnes was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his acts due to a severe mental disease or defect. 18 USCS § 17.

The Defense Expert must explain the nature of Defendant Barnes’ injuries dating back to World War 2 and effects of HYDRA experimentation. The expert’s opinion should include whether being cryogenically frozen could cause Defendant Barnes from being unable to understand the wrongfulness of his actions. The testimony should also explain how electric shock therapy impacted Barnes’ ability to appreciate the nature of his actions.

The expert witness should prepare a report of no more than three page explaining the witness’s opinions, the bases and reasons for those opinions, and the witness’s qualifications that will be the basis of the direct and cross examinations. The witness qualifications can be a CV that does not count as one of the three pages.

Goal of Government Expert Witness

The Government’s Expert Witness will rebut the Defense Witness that James Buchanan Barnes was insane in the events leading up to the launch of the Project Insight Helicarriers. The Government will focus on the fact Secretary Pierce’s orders were illegal on their face and should not have been followed.

The Government’s witness should explore that someone with amnesia can still know right from wrong, despite not remembering his/her identity. Moreover, the Expert can compare Barnes’ mental state to Charles J. Guiteau (US v Guiteau, 1 Mackey 498at *546) and Sirhan Bishara Sirhan (People v. Sirhan (1972) 7 Cal.3d 710, 727, overruled on other grounds).

The expert witness should prepare a report of no more than three page explaining the witness’s opinions, the bases and reasons for those opinions, and the witness’s qualifications that will be the basis of the direct and cross examinations. The witness qualifications can be a CV that does not count as one of the three pages.

Practice Tips for Law Students

Opening Statements are to outline the case theory and theme; Closing Argument is for argument. Students should follow the best practice that on direct examination the witness does 90% of the talking and the lawyer only 10% for asking questions. Cross-examination should have the lawyer exercising witness control by asking specific questions of the opposing expert witness.

Use of Trial Presentation Technology

Trial exhibits, opening statements, closing arguments, and jury instructions may be presented with trial presentation software, such as TrialPad or ExhibitView5 apps for tablets, or Trial Director for a laptop computer. Trial exhibits will include the expert witness reports and other provided images or video. Exhibits must first be shown without any mark-ups prior to identification or presentation to the jury and then can be marked.

Key Facts

James Buchanan Barnes was ordered by Alexander Pierce to 1) Kill Nicholas Fury, Director of SHIELD; 2) Kill Captain Steve Rogers and Natasha Romanoff; 3) Kill Captain Rogers in order to launch the Project Insight Helicarriers.

Alexander Pierce was the leader of HYDRA. James Buchanan Barnes followed Pierce’s orders, which resulted in the death of Nick Fury, and 19 SHIELD air and ground crew members.[1] Defendant Barnes attempted to stop Captain Rogers, severely Rogers with multiple gunshot wounds. If Barnes has stopped Rogers, millions of US citizens would have been killed within minutes.

In addition to the above, Defendant Barnes committed the following known crimes:

November 5, 1954: Killed three US soldiers in Berlin as a field test;

January 11, 1955: Killed entire UN Diplomatic Negotiation Team in Cairo;

May 14, 1955: Assassinated NATO General James Keller;

January 1, 1956: Assassinated British Ambassador Dalton Graines in Madripoor;

April 1, 1956: Assassinated French Defense Minister Jacques Dupuy;

May 12, 1956: Assassinated Algerian Peace Conference Envoy in Paris;

February 17, 1957: Assassinated US Colonel Jefferson Hart in Mexico City; and

March 12, 1973: Assassinated US Senator Harry Baxtor.

Charges 

Count 1: Collaboration with the Enemy

James Buchanan Barnes willfully collaborated with HYDRA since his capture in 1945.

Statutory Authority:

Collaboration with the enemy in violation of Article of War 96 and the Uniform Code of Military Justice Article 134. UNITED STATES v. GALLAGHER (U.S.A.B.R. 1957) 23 CMR 591, 596.

Count 2: Terrorism  

James Buchanan Barnes willfully committed domestic acts of terrorism by 1) assassinating Nicholas Fury; 2) attempting to publicly kill Captain Steven Rogers, Natasha Romanoff, and Samuel Wilson in downtown Washington, DC, with reckless regard for human life on buses and city streets; 3) Assisting in the launch of the Project Insight Helicarriers.

Statutory Authority:

The term “domestic terrorism” means activities that–

(A)  involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(B)  appear to be intended–

(i)  to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii)  to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or

(iii)  to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

(C)  occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

18 USCS § 2331(5)

Count 3: Acts of Terrorism Transcending National Boundaries

James Buchanan Barnes willfully committed acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries by 1) murdering Nicholas Fury 2) assaulting Nicholas Fury, Captain Steven Rogers, Natasha Romanoff, and Samuel Wilson with dangerous weapons; and 3) conspiring to launch the Project Insight Helicarriers.

Statutory Authority:

(a)  Prohibited acts.

(1)  Offenses. Whoever, involving conduct transcending national boundaries and in a circumstance described in subsection (b)–

(A)  kills, kidnaps, maims, commits an assault resulting in serious bodily injury, or assaults with a dangerous weapon any person within the United States; or

(B)  creates a substantial risk of serious bodily injury to any other person by destroying or damaging any structure, conveyance, or other real or personal property within the United States or by attempting or conspiring to destroy or damage any structure, conveyance, or other real or personal property within the United States; in violation of the laws of any State, or the United States, shall be punished as prescribed in subsection (c).

(2)  Treatment of threats, attempts and conspiracies. Whoever threatens to commit an offense under paragraph (1), or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished under subsection (c).

(b)  Jurisdictional bases.

(1)  Circumstances. The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are–

(A)  the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign commerce is used in furtherance of the offense;

(B)  the offense obstructs, delays, or affects interstate or foreign commerce, or would have so obstructed, delayed, or affected interstate or foreign commerce if the offense had been consummated;

(C)  the victim, or intended victim, is the United States Government, a member of the uniformed services, or any official, officer, employee, or agent of the legislative, executive, or judicial branches, or of any department or agency, of the United States;

(D)  the structure, conveyance, or other real or personal property is, in whole or in part, owned, possessed, or leased to the United States, or any department or agency of the United States;

(E)  the offense is committed in the territorial sea (including the airspace above and the seabed and subsoil below, and artificial islands and fixed structures erected thereon) of the United States; or

(F)  the offense is committed within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

(2)  Co-conspirators and accessories after the fact. Jurisdiction shall exist over all principals and co-conspirators of an offense under this section, and accessories after the fact to any offense under this section, if at least one of the circumstances described in subparagraphs (A) through (F) of paragraph (1) is applicable to at least one offender.

(c)  Penalties.

(1)  Penalties. Whoever violates this section shall be punished–

(A)  for a killing, or if death results to any person from any other conduct prohibited by this section, by death, or by imprisonment for any term of years or for life;

(B)  for kidnapping, by imprisonment for any term of years or for life;

(C)  for maiming, by imprisonment for not more than 35 years;

(D)  for assault with a dangerous weapon or assault resulting in serious bodily injury, by imprisonment for not more than 30 years;

(E)  for destroying or damaging any structure, conveyance, or other real or personal property, by imprisonment for not more than 25 years;

(F)  for attempting or conspiring to commit an offense, for any term of years up to the maximum punishment that would have applied had the offense been completed; and

(G)  for threatening to commit an offense under this section, by imprisonment for not more than 10 years.

(2)  Consecutive sentence. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the court shall not place on probation any person convicted of a violation of this section; nor shall the term of imprisonment imposed under this section run concurrently with any other term of imprisonment.

(d)  Proof requirements. The following shall apply to prosecutions under this section:

(1)  Knowledge. The prosecution is not required to prove knowledge by any defendant of a jurisdictional base alleged in the indictment.

(2)  State law. In a prosecution under this section that is based upon the adoption of State law, only the elements of the offense under State law, and not any provisions pertaining to criminal procedure or evidence, are adopted.

18 USCS § 2332b

Count 4: Bombings of Places of Public use, Government facilities, Public Transportation Systems and Infrastructure Facilities

James Buchanan Barnes willfully used 1) firearms and explosives on US Route 29, expanding onto the city streets of Washington, DC; 2) used explosives on the airfield of the Triskelion ; and 3) the attempted terrorist actions resulted in the destruction of the Triskelion.

Statutory Authority:

(a)  Offenses.

(1)  In general. Whoever unlawfully delivers, places, discharges, or detonates an explosive or other lethal device in, into, or against a place of public use, a state or government facility, a public transportation system, or an infrastructure facility–

(A)  with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury, or

(B)  with the intent to cause extensive destruction of such a place, facility, or system, where such destruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss,
shall be punished as prescribed in subsection (c).

(2)  Attempts and conspiracies. Whoever attempts or conspires to commit an offense under paragraph (1) shall be punished as prescribed in subsection (c).

(b)  Jurisdiction. There is jurisdiction over the offenses in subsection (a) if–

(1)  the offense takes place in the United States and–

(A)  the offense is committed against another state or a government facility of such state, including its embassy or other diplomatic or consular premises of that state;

(B)  the offense is committed in an attempt to compel another state or the United States to do or abstain from doing any act;

(C)  at the time the offense is committed, it is committed–

(i)  on board a vessel flying the flag of another state;

(ii)  on board an aircraft which is registered under the laws of another state; or

(iii)  on board an aircraft which is operated by the government of another state;

(D)  a perpetrator is found outside the United States;

(E)  a perpetrator is a national of another state or a stateless person; or

(F)  a victim is a national of another state or a stateless person;

18 USCS § 2332f

Count 5: Murder 

James Buchanan Barnes willfully killed: 1) Nicholas Fury; 2) 19 SHIELD airman; 3) three US soldiers in Berlin as a field test on November 5, 1954: 4) an entire UN Diplomatic Negotiation Team in Cairo on January 11, 1955; 5) NATO General James Keller on May 14, 1955; 6) British Ambassador Dalton Graines in Madripoor on January 1, 1956; 7) French Defense Minister Jacques Dupuy on April 1, 1956; 8) Algerian Peace Conference Envoy in Paris on May 12, 1956; US Colonel Jefferson Hart in Mexico City on February 17, 1957; and US Senator Harry Baxtor on March 12, 1973.

Statutory Authority:

(a)  Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by poison, lying in wait, or any other kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing; or committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, escape, murder, kidnaping, treason, espionage, sabotage, aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse, child abuse, burglary, or robbery; or perpetrated as part of a pattern or practice of assault or torture against a child or children; or perpetrated from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree.

Any other murder is murder in the second degree.

(b)  Within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States,

Whoever is guilty of murder in the first degree shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for life;

Whoever is guilty of murder in the second degree, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life.

18 USCS § 1111

Count 6: Treason

James Buchanan Barnes willfully levied war against the United States by participating in air piracy of the Project Insight Helicarriers to be used against the United States. 

Statutory Authority:

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $ 10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

18 USCS § 2381 

Count 7: Rebellion or Insurrection

James Buchanan Barnes willfully engaged in rebellion against the United States in the mutiny and air piracy of the Project Insight conspiracy. 

Statutory Authority:

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

18 USCS § 2383 

Count 8: Enlistment to Serve Against the United States 

James Buchanan Barnes willfully served in armed hostility against the United States in the mutiny and air piracy of the Project Insight conspiracy. 

Statutory Authority:

Whoever enlists or is engaged within the United States or in any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, with intent to serve in armed hostility against the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

18 USCS § 2390

Defenses:

Insanity Defense

(a)  Affirmative defense. It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under any Federal statute that, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the defendant, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his acts. Mental disease or defect does not otherwise constitute a defense.

(b)  Burden of proof. The defendant has the burden of proving the defense of insanity by clear and convincing evidence.

18 USCS § 17

[1] The world believes Nick Fury is dead in the MCU.

Can Supergirl Get Busted for Vandalism?

2

Supergirl faced a non-Hobson’s Choice in fighting Reactron (and thankfully not Nuclear Man): melt off lead from a historic bust in order to safely encase Reactron’s nuclear core, so it would not meltdown. Kara had to quickly balance the interests in defacing art against preventing a nuclear incident in National City.

Let’s say she picked the right choice. Art has no value if a city cannot be inhabited for 10,000 years.

Willfully destroying property is vandalism. As one Court explained:

The historical definition of vandalism was derived from the destruction of many monuments of art and literature by the Vandals, who, in the fourth and fifth centuries, overran Gaul, Spain, and northern Africa, and, in 455 A. D., entered Italy and sacked Rome. Webster’s New International Dictionary, 1951 edition. It originally meant the barbaric and reckless destroying or spoiling of something venerable, artistic, or beautiful. However, in ordinary usage the word is not limited to destruction of works of art, but has been broadened in its meaning to include the destruction of property generally.  

General Acci. Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Azar (Ga.Ct.App. 1961) 119 S.E.2d 82, 84-85, citing Webster’s New International Dictionary, 1951 edition, and 91 C. J. S., Vandalism, p. 802.

Supergirl’s bust melting would fall under the historic definition of vandalism, because a work of art had been destroyed by her actions (not necessarily barbaric or recklessly). Moreover, in the unlikely event National City is in Arkansas, she would have committed a Class D felony for defacing a “work of art on display in any public place” if the bust was worth more than $2,500. A.C.A. § 5-71-215.

No Court in the United States would find Supergirl criminally liable for vandalism. Kara’s actions were justified under the defense of necessity, which requires Supergirl prove:

1) She acted in an emergency to prevent a significant bodily harm or evil to National City, specifically a nuclear incident that could have made the city uninhabitable, massive radiation poisoning, and loss of life;

2) She had no adequate legal alternative, because Reactron was in hot pursuit to kill James Olsen and endangering National City with a nuclear device;

3) Supergirl’s acts did not create a greater danger than the one avoided (melt off some lead from a bust vs nuclear incident);

4) Supergirl actually believed that at the time she acted her actions were necessary to prevent the threatened harm or evil (Reactron was on the warpath, causing property damage and threatening others with a nuclear powered device);

5) A reasonable person would also have believed that the act was necessary under the circumstances; AND

6) The defendant did not substantially contribute to the emergency (Supergirl did not, but there is a good argument Maxwell Lord did by repairing Reactron’s battle armor).

2-3400 CALCRIM 3403

No DA in their right mind would charge Supergirl for melting a bust. Yes, it is vandalism, but these actions were justified given the gravity of the harm posed by Reactron.

Moira Queen on Trial: What Can They Actually Try Her For?

0

I hate watching the law played out on TV, because the law is often exacting and detail oriented. But good stories often require painting with a broad brush. Which means I spend a lot of time saying “You can’t do that” while being shushed by others. But, aside from a few head scratching moments, The Arrow did one of the better jobs I’ve seen. Still, for fun, here’s my favorite pieces of what they got right, and what they got wrong.

Are you required to let your opponent know when you invoke Rule 15?
Absolutely! And a good attorney invokes it as often as needed.

What does Rule 15 do?
In a Federal criminal trial it means someone wants to depose a witness before trial.  That helps you figure out how strong your case will be at trial. Both sides get to be there so, yeah, they know when you invoke it.

Under Federal civil rules you invoke Rule 15 to amend a pleading. Which you then serve on your adversary so, yeah, they also know that you invoked it.

Under Starling City rules, apparently, it means you want the death penalty… which you tell opposing counsel about in court… as a professional courtesy? They must invoke the death penalty a lot to give it its own rule. Example: “Your honor, I object! Also, I’d like to invoke Rule 15.”

Rule-15

 

Can Lead Attorney for the State Laurel be disbarred for talking to Defendant Moria Queen without Moira’s attorney present?
Yes. Will she be? Hard to say, but some kind of reprimand from the legal bar is likely.

The whole point of having a lawyer is to keep you from saying and doing things you’ll regret. Avoiding Moira’s lawyer, so you can talk to Moira alone, and convince her to take a plea deal, instead of going to trial, because you know about her affair with Malcom Merlyn, is bad form. It could screw up your case. It could also get you disbarred. Just a bad idea all around.

Did Moira engage in a Conspiracy to Murder?
Yes.

Conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to commit a criminal act with an overt act to that end. She agreed to help out Malcom Merlyn with the machines that would destroy the Glades; she gave him access to the materials necessary to build machines; and she intended that the Glades be destroyed by the machines, along with all of its occupants. So, yeah, guilty of conspiracy to murder.

Stick-figure-conspiracy

 

Does she have a defense for withdrawing?
Yes. Assuming her lawyer wasn’t so busy making unnecessary bail motions that she forgot to put on a withdrawal of conspiracy defense for the jury.

Going on TV to tell people you were part of a conspiracy is a pretty clear way to withdraw, especially if your co-conspirator is watching. And seeing as how Malcom waited some time to set off the machines, he had plenty of time to decide if he wanted to withdraw and not destroy the Glades as well. Even in a jurisdiction that requires the individual to stop the crime in order to withdraw, she would be ok because she pled for people to get out of the Glades, and then was prevented from further action by being immediately arrested by the police who would then, presumably, be responsible for stopping the crime. Unless, of course, they would prefer people who join conspiracies to withdraw by putting on a mask and going all vigilante on their former co-conspirators.

Is she responsible for aiding and abetting 503 mass murders?
That depends on how many people Malcom killed before she withdrew from the conspiracy.

She’s accountable for all the crimes that occurred before the she withdrew (including the “dozens” of murders he committed while she was part of the conspiracy) but not the stuff that happened afterwards. So, if we’re talking about the 503 people who died in the Glades after she went on TV, the answer is no.

If she were responsible for those deaths could she use duress as a defense?
No, not even if she met all the elements, which she doesn’t. Let’s run the numbers:

  • Well-grounded fear? Check!
  • Imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm? Umm… Probably not. Imminent means now, as in “right now!” Not months or years. A defense using months or years might work for someone chained in a house with no means of escape, but Moira is pretty much free to go wherever she wants and do whatever she wants whenever she wants.
  • No reasonable opportunity to escape? Well… she does live in her own house, run her own company and have enough money to go anywhere she wants in the world at any time, which would include, I’m assuming, the police station. Or, she could just tell the police when they come to her house. Which they do semi-regularly. So, I’m going to say no.

Even if she could meet all the elements, you’re not allowed to kill one person, or dozens, to save someone else, even if they are your children. Sorry Moira.

You-have-failed-this-defense

 Can she be held responsible for jury tampering?
No. Unless Starling City has a special rule for that too.

Jury tampering occurs when an individual, such as Malcom Merlyn, by use of corruption or threats tries to influence the outcome of a trial. Jury tampering is serious business, and the penalties can be pretty severe. Let’s be honest though, if you’re Malcom Merlyn, and you’ve killed hundreds of people, a little jury tampering isn’t going to keep you up at night. But Moira had nothing to do with it so she can’t be held responsible. That’s all on Malcom.

Because the jury was tampered with, can they try her again?
No.

The Fifth amendment of the U.S. Constitution forbids double jeopardy, which means you can’t be tried twice for the same crime. Even if your former co-conspirator comes back from the dead and threatens the jury, once a jury reaches a not-guilty verdict and the judge ratifies it in court, they can’t try her again for that same crime. So, Moira is a free woman, but keeping all those secrets is going to get her killed if she’s not careful. Oh, wait….

Can the ATCU Quarantine Inhumans in Suspended Animation?

0

Can the Advanced Threat Containment Unit (ATCU) put people exposed to Terrigen Crystals in suspended animation? There are a host of issues with freezing people, but the ATCU has justified the practice on the grounds the Inhumans are “sick,” thus require being placed in suspended animation until they can be cured, out of the need for public safety.

The Marvel Cinematic Universe has a precedent for placing prisoners in suspended animation. The Abomination was frozen, likely given the complexity it would take to imprison him. It was never stated whether the Abomination had a trial, but there was no question he went on a killing spree in New York City.

People exposed to Terrigen Crystals in fish oil are in a very different category. In states such as California, a peace officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts that a person has a mental disorder and is a danger to themselves or others to place them on an involuntary hold for 72-hours. Cal Wel & Inst Code § 5150.

Placing people with infectious diseases in quarantine is a legitimate exercise of police power. Compagnie Francaise De Navigation A Vapeur v. Louisiana State Bd. of Health, 186 U.S. 380, 387-388 (U.S. 1902). However, that requires people have a disease that can be passed on to others. Having super powers is certainly a condition, but not a transmittable disease.

A school can send a student home if the student has lice to prevent the spread of the parasites. Being an Inhuman could be similar, expect instead of bugs living in your hair, you breathe fire. There is no special shampoo for breathing fire.

The ATCU is holding people against their will, without a trial, in suspended animation. The ATCU does have an argument that people who suddenly have powers are a danger to those around them that does require treatment. However, being an Inhuman is neither a disease nor a mental disorder that means they are a danger to others. A new Inhuman might not be able to control their powers, but that does not mean they have engaged in conduct warranting being held against their wills.

Spooky Halloween Podcasts!

0

Halloween is a time to celebrate all things scary and sugar.

That’s right, the real villain on Halloween is teeth decay. The supporting villains this holiday are vampires, werewolves, zombies, and ghosts.

It is time to put on your best spooky outfit and enjoy some of our supernatural podcasts, because stores are now breaking out the Christmas decorations before Halloween.

Stay safe this October 31 and repress the desire to start caroling while trick or treating.