Home Blog Page 58

Join us at Long Beach Comic Con for Daredevil and Jessica Jones

1

Join fellow McGeorge alumni Megan Hitchcock and I for our first appearance at Long Beach Comic Con. We are excited to be presenting on the legal issues in Marvel’s Daredevil and Jessica Jones, Sunday, September 18, at 330pm, for “The Lawyers of Hell’s Kitchen.”

We look forward to seeing you at Long Beach Comic Con!

Program Information:

Marvel’s Daredevil and Jessica Jones both focus on lawyers and the practice of law, from Matt Murdock’s creative pro bono community service fighting crime to Jessica Jones serving a summons. Join us to determine if Karen Page properly acted in self-defense when she shot Wesley; whether Matt Murdock or Jeri Hogath is most likely to be disbarred; what would be the best way to defend the Punisher; and how the insanity defense applies to those under mind control. Join us when court is in session.

Date: Sunday, September 18, 2016

Time: 3:30-4:30 PM

Location: Danger Room, S1

Star Trek IV – The Voyage Home…To My Childhood

0

Star Trek IV is the often maligned Trek movie (I prefer to malign The Wrath of Khan) in which the crew of the Enterprise has to travel back to 1986 to capture a pair of humpback whales to prevent the destruction of Earth in the future. Directed by Spock himself, it gives the crew a chance to experience the archaic world of the 1980s in which it was filmed.

My dad was a long-time Star Trek fan and I’d grown up watching reruns of the original series but it had never grabbed my attention…until Star Trek IV. That image of Spock swimming with the whales became indelibly stuck in my head and I was amused by the crew’s struggles with the world I knew. And those same themes still work with kids – I showed my kids Star Trek IV in the run up to this year’s Comic Con (so they knew what I was going to talk about there) and they loved it too. Of course, the part that amused them the most was just how archaic 1986 looked to them (and to me). We all agreed that 1986 really is a long time ago and none of us know how I survived those times!

The humpback whales that are the focus of the movie, on the other hand, have thrived. Unlike the movie, in which the whales have become extinct in the future, humpback whale populations have improved greatly over the past several decades (three of which have passed since this movie came out, which makes me feel very old!). But no matter how good the crew’s intentions were in capturing two recently released whales and transporting them to the future, they still broke US law to do so.

The Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 very clearly prohibits the capture of any whale (or dolphin, manatee, polar bear, etc.) from U.S. waters. The Endangered Species Act also offers protection to some humpback whales, although nine of the fourteen species of humpback whales were just removed from the endangered species list within the last week. If the whales in the movie had made it to international water before they were beamed up to the Bird of Prey, the laws get a bit murkier. While there are attempts to enforce international protections for whales, not all countries comply with those protection.

Presumably, with the reintroduction of humpback whales in the future, the Federation will ensure that they are protected so that their relatives, ancestors, friends (it was never quite clear who sent the Object) don’t come looking for them again. In the meantime, I have to figure out what Trek movie I should introduce my kids to next!

Orders are Orders… Unless you’re Captain Kirk

0

Anyone who’s ever watched any of the various incarnations of Star Trek knows that sometimes things get a little dicey out in space and you can’t always rely on Starfleet Command to give you the best orders. No one in the history of ships named Enterprise has been quicker to disregard Starfleet’s orders than Captain James T. Kirk. He’s even been demoted from a position as Admiral for disobeying Starfleet (Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home). There are many examples of Kirk being a bit of a loose cannon when it comes to the orders of his superiors, and despite the fact that it usually works out for the best (like saving Earth from an alien probe that will only talk to whales) is Kirk always doing the right thing?

Let’s take a look at another example that’s a little less charged than the fate of the world. In The Original Series episode “The Amok Time” (season 2 episode 1). Kirk is ordered to attend an inauguration ceremony on Altair VI while at the same time Spock begins to undergo the Pon Farr (Vulcan time of mating) and must get to Vulcan or he will die. Kirk requests permission to divert to Vulcan so that he can save Spock but Starfleet denies his request and orders him with all speed to Altair VI. Surprising no one, Kirk diverts to Vulcan to save Spock (then has to fight him to the death; you just have to watch the episode).

spock_reasonable_accommodation

So what happens when Kirk needs to report back to Starfleet? Well, let’s assume that Starfleet has something akin to our Code of Military Justice Article 92: Failure to Obey Order or Regulation which subjects US Military members who disobey a lawful order to dishonorable discharge, fines, and up to 2 years in jail. Kirk was clearly given an order from Starfleet and we have absolutely no indication that the order was unlawful. We can easily assume that Kirk is bound to follow the orders of his superiors, so why then does he get to stay as Captain for another two seasons?

Kirk could rely on what US law refers to as the choice of evils doctrine. This is exactly what it sounds like, in a situation where you are forced to choose between two bad outcomes you aren’t criminally responsible for choosing the lesser of those two evils. Starfleet Regulation 3 Paragraph 12 seems to mirror our choice of evils in some respects, authorizing a captain to take any justifiable action to preserve the lives of their crew when threatened with imminent destruction (Voyager season 5 episode 26 “Equinox”). In Amok Time, Kirk tells Bones that he is familiar with the Altair VI situation where the Enterprise would be one of three ships showing Starfleet’s support and is not crucial to the event so Kirk must balance that with saving the life of Spock who Kirk says is considered by some to be the best first officer in the fleet. Kirk is forced to balance those harms and chooses to save Spock. A Starfleet court-marshal would have a difficult time saying that Kirk without a doubt made the wrong choice.

What is the Duty to Warn about the Salt Monster on Planet M113?

2

The world began exploring the Final Frontier of Star Trek on September 8, 1966. To honor this anniversary, let’s explore the legal issues in The Man Trap.

Star Trek began with the age-old problem many of us have faced: an old flame turns out to be an alien sucking the salt out of people to survive.

Captain Kirk, Doctor McCoy, and Crewman Darnell beam down to M113 to on the only people on the desolate planet: Dr. Robert Crater and his wife Nancy.

Except Nancy was not actually Nancy. A shape-shifting creature that fed on salt had killed the real Nancy. Disclosing that information could have saved multiple lives. Did Dr. Crater have a duty to warn Captain Kirk about the “Salt Monster” on M113?

Dr. Crater told Kirk to leave them salt and get off his planet. However, no warning was given about the shape-shifting creature. The creature killed Crewman Darnell (after appearing to him as a blonde woman who arguably made a gesture follow him). The creature ultimately killed three more crew members of the USS Enterprise. Kirk and Spock had an armed standoff with Dr. Crater, where he stated “I will kill to be alone.” Dr. Crater did not disclose the existence of the Salt Creature until Kirk and Spock stunned and captured him.

Dr. Crater referred to M113 as “his” planet. The doctor could be liable for the deaths of the Enterprise crew on a theory of premises liability. One Court explained the rule as follows:

“The true ground of liability of the owner or occupant of property to an invitee who is injured thereon is the superior knowledge of the proprietor of the existence of a condition that may subject the invitee to an unreasonable risk of harm.”

Sutton v. Sutton (1978) 145 Ga.App. 22, 25-26, citing Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp., 110 Ga. App. 170 (2a); Holtzclaw v. Lindsay, 122 Ga. App. 703.

In the Sutton case, a property owner had superior knowledge of a dangerous bull that had charged his younger son. The property owner failed in his duty to warn his other son of the danger of the bull when he asked the son to assist in the capture of the animal. Id.

The same can be said for Dr. Crater. While the crew of the Enterprise was there to perform medical exams on Dr. and Mrs. Crater, Dr. Crater knew the Salt Monster had killed his wife Nancy. Crater was aware of the danger to human life and instead covered up the threat.

The Duty to Warn applies to “known dangers” that are “not apparent or obvious.” Isbell v. Carnival Corp. (S.D.Fla. 2006) 462 F.Supp.2d 1232, 1238. The Salt Monster’s danger is not obvious because it is a shape-shifter. Whether it actually transforms into a person or merely causes others to see an image within their minds, no person could realize they were being stalked as prey until it was too late.

Dr. Crater would have had a duty to warn the crew of the Enterprise of the Salt Monster, because of the creature’s predatory nature for salt and shape-shifting powers. If Dr. Crater had told Captain Kirk what the creature was, salt could have been provided, with the creature treated as an endangered species. Unfortunately, the create was on a killing spree and attacking Captain Kirk, forcing Dr. McCoy to kill the creature.

Now, Spock recommending truth serum be used on Dr. Crater to force him to disclose information on the creature would be a huge civil rights violation.

Thank You San Francisco Comic Con

0

We had an amazing time at San Francisco Comic Con. The show was well organized and extremely family friendly. It was fantastic seeing young children and parents dressed up together as super-heroes, Jedi, Storm Troopers, or Star Fleet officers. Job well-done welcoming all to a great first time Con.

SFCC_Floor_2_6773

Over 90% of the attendees said SFCC was their first Con during our first panel. It was great seeing so many fans expressing their love for comics and science fiction.

SFCC_Neel_Josh_6765

A huge “thank you” to everyone who attended our five SFCC panels. We filled the room in four out of five of our panels. Our second Daredevil and Jessica Jones panel had great turn out on Sunday morning.

SFCC_MCU_6815

We appreciated all of the questions from the audience, interacting with others on Twitter, and visiting with attendees in the exhibit hall. Below are all of our presentations from the weekend:

STAR TREK: NOT EVERY CASE IS THE KOBAYASHI MARU

SFCC_StarTrek

The world of Star Trek has presented legal issues in infinite diversity in infinite combinations. Join the away team to discovery the new world of assumption of risk for Red Shirts, whether Tribbles are an invasive species, or if Scotty argue the insanity defense for being possessed by Jack the Ripper, and more from every Generation of Star Trek.

BLIND JUSTICE ON THE ROCKS: THE LAW OF DAREDEVIL AND JESSICA JONES

SFCC_Blind_Justice

Marvel’s Daredevil and Jessica Jones both focus on lawyers and the practice of law, from Matt Murdock’s creative pro bono community service to Jessica Jones serving a summons. Join us to determine if Karen Page properly acted in self-defense, whether Matt Murdock or Jeri Hogath is most likely to be disbarred, and how the insanity defense applies to those under mind control. Join us when court is in session.

THE LAW AWAKENS: STAR WARS LAW

SFCC_TheLawAwakens

Star Wars is more than a space opera, it is an adventure in the law! Was Han Legally Justified to Shoot First? Did Kylo Ren commit desecration of Anakin Skywalker’s corpse? What are the employee safety issues in Jabba’s Palace? Did Poe lose his ownership rights to BB-8? Could someone be prosecuted for torturing a Droid? Join us to know the ways of the law.

LEGAL DAREDEVILS: MATT MURDOCK, JESSICA JONES, AND FRANK CASTLE

SFCC_Legal_Daredevil

Marvel’s Daredevil and Jessica Jones both focus on lawyers and the practice of law, from Matt Murdock’s creative pro bono community service to Jessica Jones serving a summons. Join us to determine if Karen Page properly acted in self-defense, whether Matt Murdock or Jeri Hogath is most likely to be disbarred, and how the insanity defense applies to those under mind control. Join us when court is in session.

CIVIL WAR TO CIVIL RIGHTS: THE LAW OF THE MCU

Law_MCU

The Marvel Cinematic Universe is a world where SHIELD conducts global surveillance with every cell phone camera on Earth without a search warrant, Inhumans are held in suspended animation without a trial, and Captain America stopped the mass assassination of millions of Americans. Our panel will explore the Constitutional issues that include wiretaps, search warrants, and Civil Rights from Captain America Civil War, Captain America The Winter Soldier, Agents of SHIELD, Avengers Age of Ultron, Agent Carter, and more.

Our compliments to all of the staff who made San Francisco Comic Con a reality. Thank you for a great weekend. We look forward to returning in the future.

Fantastic Kirby Law

0

Marvel Comics is celebrating “Kirby Week” to honor the King of Comics, Jack Kirby. August 28, 2016 would have been “King Kirby’s” 99th Birthday. There are many activities to honor one of the most creative people in comic history, from “Kirby 4 Heroes,” which is organized by his granddaughter, to podcasts, and interviews.

Let’s review some of the legal lessons we have from the Fantastic Four to celebrate Kirby’s birthday.

No Written Disclosure of Risks

There are MANY legal issues with the Richards’ flight. Reed Richards led Susan Storm, Ben Grimm, and Johnny Storm on an unauthorized space flight to beat the Soviets into space. Richards wanted to go to the Moon or Mars, varying between FF issues 1 and 2. Regardless, the flight ends with the crew being bombarded by cosmic rays, and crashing back on Earth.

Susan Storm demanded to go because she was Reed’s fiancé. Johnny went because his sister was on the flight. Neither reason should be an excuse to not have required astronaut training. At best, the Storms were “space flight participants.”

FF_Trespassing

Not the Right [Legal] Stuff

Under current Federal law, the operator of a spacecraft must inform space flight participants in writing about the risks of launch and reentry. 14 C.F.R. § 460.45(a). This writing must also include the safety record of the vehicle. The warning must also include:

(1) For each mission, each known hazard and risk that could result in a serious injury, death, disability, or total or partial loss of physical and mental function;

(2) That there are hazards that are not known; and

(3) That participation in space flight may result in death, serious injury, or total or partial loss of physical or mental function.

460.45(a)(1)-(3).

There was no serious discussion about the risks of space flight. Ben Grimm raised the issue of cosmic rays, only to be called a coward Susan Storm. It is ironic the person most concerned about safety was turned into The Thing. Moreover, if test flights had been conducted with chimps, perhaps written warnings would have included the risk of being turned into a rock monster or bursting in flames.

Not the Best Way to Seek Informed Consent.

Not the Best Reason to Waive Unknown Risks. 

Trespassing on Government Property

The Fantastic Four’s flight was more than unauthorized: they broke into the base to launch the rocket. Whoever enters a military base without authorization can be fined, imprisoned for up to six months, or both. 18 U.S.C.S. § 1382.

Yes, Reed Richards did build the rocket. However, Richards was not authorized to launch the rocket on a mission to the Moon (or Mars). Moreover, neither Storm should have been on the base. Arguably all were trespassing.

Fantastic Lawyers

Jack Kirby did not draw comics of lawyers deposing expert witnesses coming off the page. Let’s be honest, that would not be very exciting to the entire population. Instead Kirby brought new worlds to life with the Fantastic Four, the Avengers, Captain America, Thor, and other comics from the Age of Marvel. To the great legend and all of those honoring Jack Kirby, Happy Birthday.

A Doctor on Doctor Strange’s Hippocratic Oath

0

Doctor Strange “The Oath” is a mystical adventure focused on the Hippocratic Oath. Dr. Raja Chatterjee is a doctor in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, and a Naval Officer. Dr. Chatterjee is also a lifelong geek.

Join Dr. Chatterjee and I as we discuss Doctor Strange “The Oath,” and the different oaths of professionalism doctors take in their careers, from the Hippocratic to Maimonides to Geneva.

We are very pleased to announce our first contest with a t-shirt promo code certificate from Red Chapter Clothing. I met the Red Chapter team at San Diego Comic Con (and bought four of their shirts). Red Chapter has awesome Marvel licensed shirts AND their shirts sold at both Disneyland and Disney World. We are thrilled to have them sponsoring $25 gift certificate codes as prizes.

Here are the rules: the first person to correctly answer the Doctor Strange trivia question will win the gift code. You can enter your answer on the below form.