“We have hope. Rebellions are built on hope.” So says Jyn Erso in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. On December 16th we get to see the early days of the Rebellion, formed to fight Darth Sidious, who has transformed the Republic into an empire with him at the head.
As much as I loved A Force Awakens, I am very excited to see Rogue One because it brings back one of the all-time great Hollywood villains: Darth Vader (Kylo Ren is for the young kids). And this should be Vader at his most evil, before his son softened him up. This Vader, after all, is not too far removed from the angry Anakin who slaughtered the younglings in the Jedi temple (a mass murder/potential hate crime, although Anakin may claim insanity).
As Lord Vader, he’s still settling into his workplace management style. This may be our chance to see just how evil he was in his early days as a “manager.” We know, of course, that by the time of A New Hope he’s willing to choke (but not kill, thanks to Grand Moff Tarkin) a commander who mocks the Force…
Not only could this be viewed as creating a hostile workplace (it could be argued that Vader is choking the commander because they have different religious beliefs), but assault is always a criminal offense and no more permitted in the workplace than it would be anywhere else.
By the time of The Empire Strikes Back, Vader isn’t holding back anymore. This time, he has no qualms about killing an admiral who has displeased him:
While some employee errors can be so serious as to warrant immediate termination, that means termination of the employment, not of the employee’s life.
Needless to say, Vader will not be held accountable for any of these crimes because his leader has taken the Republic (which presumably had laws that were suppose to apply equally to all) and transformed it into a dictatorship, under which the Emperor’s people may disregard the law and abuse or kill others with impunity. It makes for a great movie but this kind of disregard for basic laws and individual rights is not what any of us would want to experience in real life.
So I’m excited to see my favorite bad guy this December (I’m also excited to run into him at Comic Con), but I prefer that he stays in a galaxy far, far away.
Could Sheriff Evie Barret commandeer a pick-up truck in the Stan Against Evil episode “Know, Know, Know, Your Goat”?
The current laws of New Hampshire do not specifically address police commandeering private vehicles. However, the state had allowed for it in the past. In a New Hampshire Supreme Court case, the Court discussed statutory authority for police vehicles, ambulances, and “private cars, when commandeered for use by the police,” were exempted from speed limits. See, Vandell v. Sanders, 155 A. 193, 194-95 (N.H. 1931), citing P. L., c. 103, s. 18.
New Hampshire law speaks to police powers and “vehicles when driven with due regard for safety under the direction of the peace officers in the chase or apprehension of violators of the law or of persons charged with or suspected of any such violation…” N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 265:61.
Sheriff Barret did drive the commandeered pick-up with due regard of safety in order to apprehend suspected violators of the law. In this case, that suspected violator was a demon goat. There is a high likelihood that the mayor of Willard’s Mill would respond to demonic goats the same way that Mayor Larry Vaughn did to shark attacks in Jaws. There would be denial, ridicule, followed by a massive lawsuit by anyone who lost a loved one to demonic forces.
Jessica and I are deeply humbled to have made the ABA Journal Blawg 100 for the fourth time. We are honored people enjoy our blog.
Thank you to everyone who nominated us and the editors at the ABA Journal.
We work hard to have fun with the law and pop culture. There was no shortage of great topics to blog about, thanks to all of the comic book and science fiction movies/TV shows that came out in 2016.
We also have had a great time attending Cons this year. Here are just a few of the highlights:
Presented at Long Beach Comic Con for the first time;
Moderated the Firefly panel at Alien Con with Jewel Staite; and
Presented at San Diego Comic Con with my brother on Supergirl and Star Trek with California Supreme Court Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuellar.
I want to thank all of our guest bloggers for their posts: Neel Chatterjee who helped us celebrate the 50th Anniversary of Star Trek; Sylvia La Rosa, Christina McAmis, Kean Zimmerman, and Jordon Huppert for honoring the 75th Anniversary of Captain America; Brad Blanchard for asking who owns the Millennium Falcon; Megan Smith analyzing the HIPAA violations in Doctor Strange; and Jack Yang who took on the data security issues in the X-Men. Stay tune for upcoming guest posts on Star Wars to celebrate Rogue One.
Thank you to all of our readers and the ABA Journal for making 2016 awesome.
From the Mock Trial of the Winter Soldier
About the ABA Journal:
The ABA Journal is the flagship magazine of the American Bar Association, and it is read by half of the nation’s 1.1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal profession from Wall Street to Main Street to Pennsylvania Avenue. ABAJournal.com features breaking legal news updated as it happens by staff reporters throughout every business day, a directory of more than 4,000 lawyer blogs, and the full contents of the magazine.
About the ABA:
With nearly 400,000 members, the American Bar Association is the largest voluntary professional membership organization in the world. As the national voice of the legal profession, the ABA works to improve the administration of justice, promotes programs that assist lawyers and judges in their work, accredits law schools, provides continuing legal education, and works to build public understanding around the world of the importance of the rule of law.
Luke Cage gained his enhanced strength and bulletproof skin from an experimental treatment at Seagate prison after injuries sustained from a beating orchestrated by corrupt prison guards. See, Marvel’s Luke Cage on Netflix, Episode 4, “Step in the Arena.”
Forcing prisoners to fight and conducting medical experiments without their consent are massive Civil Rights violations. The Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment includes anything from “physically barbarous punishments” to punishments that are incompatible with “the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.” See, Bailey v. Lally, 481 F. Supp. 203, 218-19 (D. Md. 1979), citing Gregg v. Georgia, 96 S. Ct. 2909 (joint opinion) and Trop v. Dulles, 78 S. Ct. 590.
Recording prisoners fighting for online videos is a barbaric punishment that is incompatible with any standard of decency. Subjecting those prisoners to medical experiments would be a second Civil Rights violation.
Individuals have a “liberty interest in their bodily integrity” that is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In re Cincinnati Radiation Litig., 874 F. Supp. 796, 810-11 (S.D. Ohio 1995) and Albright v. Oliver, 127 L. Ed. 2d 114, 114 S. Ct. 807 (1994).
Courts take these rights serious. One case found that nonconsensual experiments with high doses of radiation supervised by military doctors that were performed by city physicians violated that right. Id.
Medical experiments on human beings were one of the dominating issues at the war crimes trials of the Nazis. The judgment from trial is known as the “Nuremberg Code.” The Code states the following on consent:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health and person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
In re Cincinnati Radiation Litig., at *820, citing the “Nuremberg Code.”
Luke Cage clearly had his rights violated with being forced into fighting matches, threats, and being beaten. The medical experiment that saved his life is more complicated. Luke had been severely injured in a beating. Dr. Reva Connors (Luke’s future wife killed by Jessica Jones under the control of Kilgrave) took the dying Luke Cage to Dr. Noah Burstein’s lab for an experimental medical procedure.
Dr. Burstein did not attempt to get informed consent from Luke Cage on the medical experiment. Dr. Burstein had a personal duty to get Luke’s consent before engaging in the procedure. This could not be delegated to Dr. Reva Connors, as she was not performing the experiment. In re Cincinnati Radiation Litig., at *820.
Luke was in danger of dying, but was not incapacitated to give informed consent. Dr. Burstein could argue he acted in an emergency situation, however, that argument would be stronger if Luke had been unable to answer questions.
It is unlikely any of the prisoners at Seagate who were experimented on gave Dr. Burstein their consent. One prisoner experiment case had a multidisciplinary oversight committee composed of physicians and non-physicians, including professors of law, social work, pharmacology, and psychology. No such oversight was done at Seagate to vindicate prisoner rights. See, Bailey, at *213.
Seagage prison is a massive lawsuit waiting to happen in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. If only there was a fictional lawyer who could take the case…
Check out for my guest post on the Exterro blog on the new Green Arrow Rebirth series!
Some people might think of comic books as flights of fancy filled with characters wielding supernatural powers to fight foes from other planets, and yes, that’s true. But there are other comics that, while still being imaginative fictions, ground themselves in the real world. Even in the world of Big Data and E-Discovery.
A great example of this is Green Arrow. The title character — who’s alter ego is Oliver Queen, CEO of Queen Industries — has no superhuman or special powers other than being an amazing archer with a lot of resources and a drive for social justice. In the latest iteration, Oliver Queen uses technology to his advantage when fighting crime in his home city of Seattle, and real-life elements that mirror our world – computer forensics, wire fraud, banking laws, even a DC version of Bitcoin (aptly named Lexcoin after Superman’s nemesis Lex Luthor) – show up in the stories.
I recently spoke with Green Arrow writer, Benjamin Percy, about his thoughts on this, and he said, “So much of our lives are presently online. Socially, financially, professionally — our tracks are everywhere. We can so easily end up violated or even…possessed, erased by hackers, viruses. Green Arrow is a comic that — more than most — taps into the zeitgeist. I’m channeling cultural anxieties onto the page, and it’s natural that electronic data and commerce will play into my storylines.”
For further analysis relating Percy’s narratives to the legal world, I asked Joshua Gilliland, Esq. — blogger for Bow Tie Law, and one of the two founding attorney bloggers for The Legal Geeks – to take a look at the latest story arc in Green Arrow: Rebirth. Here’s what he had to say:
Oh, Doctor Strange. While this is an excellent movie, and the Marvel filmmakers should be commended for their commitment to verisimilitude when it comes to neurosurgery and physics, having apparently consulted with both neurosurgeons and astrophysicist Adam Frank, their legal research as regards healthcare law, especially HIPAA, appears to have been… lacking.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, is designed to protect individuals’ personal healthcare information from wrongful disclosure, i.e., disclosures made without patient authorization and not otherwise allowed under the Act, such as for research purposes. 45 CFR 164.508; 45 C.F.R. § 164.512. HIPAA protects against the disclosure of information, both oral and recorded, that “‘[i]s created or received by a health care provider […] and ‘[r]elates to the past, present, or future physical or mental health or condition of an individual; the provision of health care to an individual; or the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to an individual.’” In re Am. Med. Sys., Inc. Pelvic Repair Sys. Prod. Liab. Litig., 946 F. Supp. 2d 512, 515–16 (S.D.W. Va. 2013); 42 U.S.C. § 1320d(4).
While no private cause of action is created under HIPAA (meaning that individuals whose private medical information has been wrongfully disclosed cannot sue using HIPAA), there are penalties which the US Department of Health and Human Services can impose on a person for knowingly disclosing “individually identifiable health information to another person.” These penalties range from a $50,000 fine and up to 1 year of imprisonment to a $250,000 fine and up to 10 years of imprisonment “if the offense is committed with intent to sell, transfer, or use individually identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain, or malicious harm.” 42 U.S.C.A. § 1320d-6(b). Individuals whose information has been wrongfully disclosed may also be able to sue under State tort law.
After Doctor Stephen Strange has his hands crippled in a car accident and is forced into attending physical therapy with an orderly, Strange and the orderly get into a fight. Strange yells at the man that physical therapy will never work on injuries as extensive as his and that he, Strange, would know this because he, unlike the orderly, is ACTUALLY a doctor. The orderly challenges Strange’s self-satisfied pessimism, telling him that one of his previous patients had cured himself of quadriplegia through some special physical therapy. At this point, the orderly has not related any individually identifiable information to Strange—only that there was some previous, nonspecific, patient who had cured himself of quadriplegia, so it’s unlikely that a HIPAA violation has occurred at this point.
“I taught myself Sanskrit and the many ancient languages of magic, but HIPAA is, apparently, beyond me.” Photo credit to: http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/676135-40-screenshots-from-the-doctor-strange-teaser-trailer
The orderly keeps talking, however, which is a problem. Because the orderly lets himself get emotionally involved in proving Strange wrong, he offers to get the cured patient’s file and bring it to Strange. Strange accepts the proposal, finds the cured patient (Jonathan Pangborn), and uses the information Pangborn provides him to travel to Nepal and further the plot on his way to becoming the Sorcerer Supreme. The problem with this is that Strange’s mystical journey stems from a clear HIPAA violation. The orderly passed on healthcare documents relating to Pangborn’s past medical treatments and current physical condition to a totally unauthorized person. Strange was not part of Pangborn’s medical team, and there is nothing to suggest that Pangborn authorized the orderly to release his confidential medical records to anyone who might benefit from magical medical intervention.
“Let’s just ignore the convoluted and DEFINITELY illegal pathway that took me here and chalk up my blissful stomping of HIPAA to the strength of my selfish desire to get my beautiful, Cumberbatchian, hands back and not ignorance of my basic legal and ethical obligations as a doctor.” Photo credit to: http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/676135-40-screenshots-from-the-doctor-strange-teaser-trailer
Although, as mentioned above, there are circumstances under which personally identifiable healthcare information can be disclosed without authorization, none appear to apply here (as an example, Strange would have a hard time arguing that he took Pangborn’s files for researching the Ancient One’s healing practices because Strange would have needed board approval before taking the files in the first place, and that seems unlikely when the subject of the research is a long-lived bald woman’s magical powers).
The fact that Strange used to work for the same hospital which treated Pangborn (or perhaps still works for the hospital in some fashion) also does not cure the violation. A patient’s private information must be screened even from other employees unless those employees need the information to go about their daily tasks. 45 C.F.R. § 164.514(d). Because medical files can essentially only be accessed on a need-to-know basis, they should only be given to staff actively working with Pangborn or perhaps going through Pangborn’s files for some kind of internal quality control review. Again, as Strange has never treated Pangborn, and as he does not appear to fall under any of the exceptions to HIPAA, he should not have been given access to Pangborn’s files.
In conclusion, that orderly (as well as the hospital he works for) are in for one HELL of a fine. Maybe once Doctor Strange conquers alchemy, he’ll be able to help them out.
All of the books with spells in Doctor Strange have a dangerous commonality: All warnings on risks are after the spells.
Apparently no sorcerers ever sought legal advice. Most warnings are stated before someone takes a medication or engages in a high-risk activity. Consider the rules for drugs and medical devices:
Any drug or device is misbranded unless its labeling bears all of the following information:
(a) Adequate directions for use.
(b) Such adequate warnings against use in pathological conditions or by children where its use may be dangerous to health.
(c) Adequate warning against unsafe dosage or methods or duration of administration or application.
Warnings shall be in a manner and form as are necessary for the protection of users.
Cal. Health & Safety Code § 111375.
Magical warnings placed after spells could result in conditions dangerous to one’s health. The spells do give directions for adequate use, but warnings on possible risks do not appear until after a user starts casting the spell.
Casting spells are not like operating a lawnmower. A person who injured their own foot by running over it with a lawnmower was on notice of multiple warnings in the instruction book and on the lawnmower itself. See, Bell v. Montgomery Ward, 792 F. Supp. 500, 506 (W.D. La. 1992). Moreover, lawnmowers have spinning blades at high speed in order to cut grass. This makes the risk of a lawnmower obvious. A spell is not obvious of any dangerous intent of its normal use within the knowledge of a first-time user.
There is also danger in crossing realms without adequate warning. For example, public beaches require warnings if there are bacteriological dangers that pose a risk to public health. Cal. Health & Safety Code § 115915. There are no warnings on what could be on the other side of a portal opened by a sling ring.
A major theme in the current Doctor Strange comics is magic has a cost. The issue is whether there is adequate warning for what a spell can do. Placing warnings after spells would require the wizard who wrote the book to cast a costly spell to cover damages.