Short answer: No.
A government employee sued the Federal government because of Halloween decorations. The Plaintiff was a Pentecostal Christian and found decorations of witches offensive, because the decorations celebrated Paganism. Rosa-Ruiz v. Gonzalez-Galoffin, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69905, at *3 (D.P.R. Sept. 20, 2007) The Plaintiff complained that the decorations in a government building violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The test whether the Establishment Clause has been violated is whether, “the government practice has the effect, intentionally or unintentionally, of communicating a message of government endorsement or disapproval of religion would there be a violation of the Establishment Clause.” Rosa-Ruiz, *10.
The “Lemon test” requires Courts to determine whether the challenged law or conduct has a secular purpose, whether its primary purpose is to advance or inhibit religion, and whether it creates an excessive entanglement with religion. Rosa-Ruiz, at *10-11.
The Court held that the display of cats, goblins or a screeching mat did not convey the endorsement of a religion. The Court stated:
Halloween lost its religious and superstitious overtones long ago. It has become instead a commercial holiday enjoyed by communities in its many forms of entertainment.
The Plaintiff’s claim that the decorations violated the Establishment Clause failed, because there was nothing else to support it. Rosa-Ruiz, at *12.
Granted, if the Secretary of Health & Human Services suddenly demands tribute of the first born of each household in order for health insurance websites to work, we would have multiple legal challenges beyond the First Amendment.
Moral of the story: Having decorations or giving out candy to kids on Halloween does not make you a Pagan/Devil worshiper/foot soldier in the Army of Darkness. It might make you an enabler or tooth decay, so tell Trick or Treaters to brush their teeth.